Скачать или смотреть Solving XML Content-Type Mock Issues in Spring Cloud Contract

Discover how to specify mocks in `Spring Cloud Contract` using XML and XPath conditions to address similar content-type challenges in your WSDL schema.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63575557/ asked by the user 'Jacek Szyper' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7332453/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63599329/ provided by the user 'Jacek Szyper' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7332453/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Spring cloud contract with XML. Trying to specify mock depend on request

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving XML Content-Type Mock Issues in Spring Cloud Contract

When working with Spring Cloud Contract, developers often encounter scenarios where multiple XML schemas have the same content type. This can make it challenging to specify the correct mock responses based on the incoming requests. In particular, this issue arises in cases where your WSDL elements are structured similarly, creating ambiguity when implementing your mocks. If you have found yourself in a situation like this, you're not alone. Let's explore a solution together.

Understanding the Problem

The primary challenge occurs due to the repeated content types in different XML schemas and the need to differentiate between them. Given that each xsd may share a content type, it becomes essential to accurately specify conditions that can pinpoint the exact mock response you want based on the incoming request's XML structure.

Key Questions:

How can you specify a mock response when the content types are identical?

Is it possible to differentiate these responses based on the root element of the XML?

The Solution

After encountering and overcoming this problem, the solution lies in leveraging additional XPath conditions. By examining the root element of the XML structure, you can trigger specific mocks based on that unique identifier.

Step-by-Step Breakdown

Here’s how to implement this solution using Spring Cloud Contract:

Identify the Root Element: First, figure out which part of your XML uniquely identifies your request. In many cases, this is the root element.

Modify Your Contract: Integrate an additional XPath condition in your mock contract to focus on that identifier.

Here's an example modification based on the existing mock contract you might have:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Test Your Contract: Deploy your revised contract and run tests to ensure that your mock responses are now correctly matched based on the specified root element in the XML request.

Conclusion

By adding a nuanced XPath condition that checks for the root element, you can effectively tackle the issue of identical content types in your WSDL and XML schemas with Spring Cloud Contract. This empowers you with better control over your API mocking, resulting in more precise and predictable unit testing outcomes. If you face similar dilemmas, remember to look for unique identifiers within your data structure that can guide your mocks effectively.

Stay tuned for more insights on efficient API development practices with Spring and beyond!