Скачать или смотреть How to Serialize the Same Object Type in Two JSON Formats

Learn how to effectively serialize a C- object in multiple JSON formats while handling JsonIgnore attributes efficiently.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73992450/ asked by the user 'Hank' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1045116/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73994142/ provided by the user 'mathis1337' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2751224/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to serialize the same object type in two JSON formats

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Serialize the Same Object Type in Two JSON Formats

Serialization is an essential technique used to convert objects into a format that can be easily stored or transmitted. For developers working in C-, specifically with Json.NET, serialization often comes with specific requirements, such as needing to serialize the same object type in multiple formats. This guide provides a detailed guide on how to serialize the same object type in two JSON formats.

The Problem: Multiple Serialization Formats

You might have a scenario where you are working with a class, DTOModule, that has several properties, but you wish to serialize that object to JSON in different ways. In your case:

Default Serialization: One output format includes properties like Name, Prefix, Description, and ImagePath.

Custom Serialization: For a different use case, you want to alter the serialized output to include Prefix, ExpiryDate, IsEnabled, and DisabledDescription.

The challenge is to have an organized method for achieving this without resorting to ad-hoc solutions like LINQ queries or anonymous objects.

The Solution: Creating New Classes for Different Serializations

The most effective way to handle this challenge is to define a new class that does not inherit the properties marked with [JsonIgnore] from your base class. Here’s how you can implement this solution:

Step 1: Understanding Class Inheritance

In C-, when you create a subclass, it inherits properties and methods from its base class. However, you can override properties in the subclass to change their behavior. Here’s a simplified example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, Foo has a property ignored for serialization, while Bar overrides that property with a JsonProperty attribute, allowing it to be serialized.

Step 2: Implementing Your Solution with DTOModule

For your specific case with DTOModule, create a new class, DTOModuleExt, that inherits from DTOModule and overrides the necessary properties:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Serializing the Objects

Now, you can serialize both the base class and the new class and observe the different outputs. Here's a full working example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 4: Comparing the Outputs

The base class DTOModule produces a JSON string excluding ignored properties.

The derived class DTOModuleExt includes the IsEnabled property as desired, demonstrating the capability to serialize the object in multiple formats.

Conclusion

By creating a derived class and leveraging C-’s inheritance capabilities, you can effectively manage multiple serialization formats for your classes. This approach not only addresses your immediate needs but also provides a scalable solution for additional properties in the future. Always remember to think about your class structures up front; planning modular classes can save you a lot of headaches down the line!