Скачать или смотреть How to Hash a Class with Private Members in C+ + Using std::hash

A comprehensive guide on leveraging `std::hash` to hash classes with private members in C+ + . Learn how to properly implement hashing while maintaining encapsulation.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66790318/ asked by the user 'Luke' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1430630/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66790369/ provided by the user 'Yamahari' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7508046/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: std:hash with access to private members of a class

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Hashing Classes with Private Members in C+ + : A Complete Guide

When it comes to hashing classes in C+ + , developers often find themselves grappling with encapsulation, especially when dealing with private members. One common scenario is needing to hash a class, while the hash function lacks access to the class's private attributes. This guide walks you through how to effectively hash a class like Foo, which encapsulates its member data, while still complying with the constraints of C+ + accessibility.

Understanding the Problem

Let's take a closer look at our class, Foo, which contains two private members: std::string a and std::string b. The challenge arises when we try to define a hash function for Foo using std::hash, as it does not have access to these private members directly.

Here’s a simplistic version of the class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When we want to implement std::hash<Foo>, we face a significant issue: the hash function cannot access the private members a and b.

Here’s what a troublesome attempt at defining the hash function would look like:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Solution

To solve this issue while maintaining your class’s encapsulation, we have a straightforward solution: declare std::hash<Foo> as a friend of Foo. This allows the hash function to access private members directly without violating encapsulation principles.

Implementing the Solution

Here’s the code to implement this solution:

Modify your Foo class to establish a friendship with std::hash<Foo>:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Code:

In the code above, we declare std::hash<Foo> as a friend within the Foo class. This grants the std::hash<Foo> struct the ability to access Foo's private members a and b.

In the hash function implementation, we utilize std::hash<std::string> to generate hashes for foo.a and foo.b.

We combine the hashes by using the XOR operator (^), which is a common technique to mix the outputs.

Conclusion

By declaring std::hash<Foo> as a friend of the Foo class, we navigate the constraints of C+ + encapsulation while still allowing the hash function to operate correctly on private data. This approach not only ensures good design principles but also enables seamless integration with standard libraries like std::map and std::set, enhancing data structures' performance with custom classes.

Feel free to explore libraries like Boost or Abseil for additional solutions, particularly for more complex scenarios. Happy coding!