Скачать или смотреть Revisiting the Quantum-Consciousness Nexus,

9.1 Revisiting the Quantum-Consciousness Nexus
At the core of this paradigm shift lies the mounting evidence that quantum-coherent phenomena are not confined to isolated physical systems under laboratory conditions but extend into the warm, noisy biological realm.
The demonstrated quantum coherence and entanglement within biological microtubules (Penrose-Hameroff Orch-OR supported by recent Wellesley rat anesthesia experiments) indicate that quantum information processing might be a physiological substrate for conscious states.


The discovery of photon emission and potential entanglement within myelin sheaths, as proposed by Shanghai University studies, suggests a previously unappreciated quantum communication channel across long-range neural pathways, potentially enabling the synchronized global workspace that correlates with conscious experience.


These findings imply that consciousness may be anchored in quantum physical processes, challenging classical neuronal firing-based models and calling for integrated neuro-quantum frameworks that map micro- and macro-scale brain dynamics.



9.2 Observer Theories and Informational Ontologies
The conceptual advances in observer theory, particularly Zaghi’s relational quantum dynamics model with embedded awareness, and Elshatlawy et al.’s cybernetic observer framework, propose an elegant ontological model whereby measurement and awareness are co-constitutive phenomena, inseparable from the physical dynamics of the universe:
By leveraging tools from category theory, information theory (including Integrated Information Theory metrics Φ), and cybernetics, these frameworks propose that observers are fundamentally feedback systems, whose interactions instantiate the collapse of quantum possibilities into experiential actuality.


The “meta-vacuum” hypothesis and associated informational substrates, as championed by Kharchuk and Giannakopoulos, shift the metaphysical ground to an informational primality where space-time and consciousness emerge from computational domains like K₀/K₁. This bridges physics and phenomenology, suggesting consciousness is not emergent but ontologically co-primary with physical reality.



9.3 Empirical Rigor in Psi and Remote Perception
While highly controversial, the modern iteration of remote viewing (RV) and psi research deserves serious scientific consideration:
Meta-analyses demonstrate small but statistically robust effects beyond chance, with effect sizes comparable to early psychophysical phenomena now accepted in mainstream science.


Methodological innovations, including triple-blind protocols and automated randomization, improve reliability and reduce bias.


Correlations with individual emotional intelligence and physiological markers suggest a psychophysiological basis for psi ability, inviting a convergence between consciousness research and subtle biophysical fields.


Despite this, mainstream science remains skeptical due to lack of mechanistic explanation and difficulties in replicability—challenges that QCS and integrated informational quantum models may ultimately address.

9.4 Bridging Disciplinary Boundaries
The future progress of consciousness science requires an integrated multidisciplinary approach, dissolving traditional boundaries among:
Quantum physics, with its advanced models of nonlocality, entanglement, and measurement theory,


Neuroscience, focusing on microtubule dynamics, biophotonics, and large-scale neurodynamics,


Information science, especially theories of integrated information, causal emergence, and computational complexity,


Phenomenology and cognitive science, preserving the richness of subjective experience and first-person data.


Such synergy will allow:
The development of novel experimental techniques capable of detecting and manipulating brain-based quantum coherence,


The formulation of testable hypotheses linking informational substrates to conscious states,


The design of rigorous, reproducible psi protocols cross-validated by neurophysiological coherence measures,


The theoretical grounding to reconcile observer effects in quantum mechanics with experiential awareness.



9.5 The Ontological and Epistemological Implications
Accepting consciousness as a fundamental dimension of reality disrupts long-standing paradigms in science and philosophy:
It challenges reductionist physicalism, demanding a dual-aspect monism or panpsychist framework where consciousness and matter are co-fundamental,


It repositions the observer not as a passive recorder but an active participant in the unfolding cosmos, potentially influencing collapse, causality, and information flow,


It elevates information as a primal substrate, aligning with Wheeler’s “It from Bit” and modern computational ontologies,


It demands a reevaluation of the nature of time, causality, and entropy in light of observer-dependent quantum processes and informational erasure domains (K₀/K₁).