Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Difference in DispatchTime Calculations in Swift

Discover the nuances between different `DispatchTime` calculations in Swift. Learn why simpler options exist and how to use them effectively in your code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/77098157/ asked by the user 'Ahmet Sancar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13056144/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/77098835/ provided by the user 'Martin R' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1187415/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: What is the difference between these DispatchTime calculations?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Difference in DispatchTime Calculations in Swift

When working with asynchronous code in Swift, it’s common to manage timing and delays using the DispatchTime class. However, you may encounter varying calculations for DispatchTime, leading to some confusion. This guide will clarify these differences by examining a specific example related to the tinyDelay definition and its implications.

The Problem: Confusing DispatchTime Definitions

In an older version of the AlamofireImage library, you might come across the following line of code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

At first glance, this looks complicated and raises the question: Why not simplify this? An alternate definition that seems more straightforward might look like:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

So, what’s going on here? Why choose one method over the other?

Breaking Down the Original Code

The original calculation can be broken down into its components:

DispatchTime.now(): This retrieves the current dispatch time.

Int64(0.001 * Float(NSEC_PER_SEC)): This part converts 0.001 seconds into nanoseconds (the base unit of NSEC_PER_SEC), rounding to an integer.

Double(...)/Double(NSEC_PER_SEC): Finally, it converts that integer value back into a Double, yielding a delay of 0.001 seconds.

While this approach works, it resembles a (bad) translation of standard Objective-C code, which uses:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This demonstrates a lack of simplicity that Swift excels at, raising concerns about readability and maintainability.

The Simpler Solution

Swift allows for a more concise and readable way to define the same time delay. Here are two options that should be favored over the original complex calculation:

Using a Simple Double:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using Milliseconds:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

These simpler alternatives maintain functionality while improving readability and ease of understanding for other developers who may read your code in the future.

Key Takeaways

Readability is Crucial: Writing code that is easy to read and understand is as important as its functionality.

Leverage Swift's Features: Swift provides simpler options for common tasks, steering you toward cleaner and more maintainable code.

Avoid Unnecessary Complexity: If a task can be accomplished with fewer lines of code without losing functionality, it’s often the best approach.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences in DispatchTime calculations can help you write cleaner, more efficient code. Always strive for simplicity in your programming practice, allowing your solutions to be not only functional but also easy to understand. By adopting straightforward and idiomatic Swift practices, you can enhance both your coding experience and the overall quality of your projects.