Скачать или смотреть Trump "ORDERED TO TESTIFY" Under Oath? The "Final Appeal" Truth | is it really true?

A major constitutional confrontation has emerged surrounding Donald Trump and the enforcement of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, triggering a complex legal battle in J.G.G. v. Trump. While viral reports suggest imminent incarceration or a successful "Tyranny" impeachment, the actual docket reveals a more nuanced conflict involving high-ranking Department of Justice subordinates and a finding of criminal contempt by Judge Boasberg. This report investigates the specific timeline of events where executive officials allegedly nullified a judicial order regarding deportation flights, examining the severe legal consequences that now face agency leadership rather than Donald Trump personally.
This video provides a forensic breakdown of the "Arctic Frost" investigation and the failed legislative strategy behind House Resolution 353 to separate verified court proceedings from online rumors. We analyze the procedural reality of the "Privileged Resolution" tactic in the 119th Congress and clarify why subpoenas issued to administration attorneys were conflated with orders directed at Donald Trump. By reviewing the primary source text and appellate outcomes, we define the precise boundaries of executive immunity and judicial authority in this developing separation of powers crisis.


📝 Sources & References:

I. Legislative Records: House Resolution 353 (Impeachment)

These official government records confirm the introduction, text, and withdrawal of the impeachment resolution by Rep. Shri Thanedar.

1. H.Res. 353 – Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors (All Actions)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...


2. Text of H.Res. 353 (Government Publishing Office)
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/B...


3. PolicyEngage Legislative Tracking: H.Res. 353 Summary and Sponsors
https://trackbill.com/bill/us-congres...




---

II. Judicial Records: J.G.G. v. Trump (Deportations & Contempt)

These sources document the specific court orders, the “criminal contempt” findings against the administration (not the President personally), and the appellate rulings.

4. Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse: Case Summary and Docket for J.G.G. v. Trump
https://clearinghouse.net/case/46232/


5. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Opinion Remanding Contempt Inquiry (August 8, 2025)
https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opini...


6. Just Security: “Bove, Criminal Contempt, and Boasberg” (Analysis of the Whistleblower Allegations)
https://www.justsecurity.org/116777/b...


7. CBS News: Federal Judge to Resume Contempt Inquiry into Trump Officials
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/federal-...


8. AP News: Justice Department Asks Appeals Court to Block Contempt Investigation
https://apnews.com/article/trump-judg...


9. Fox News: Trump Admin Fights to Block Boasberg Contempt Probe & DOJ Testimony
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trum...


10. Washington Examiner: Judge Boasberg Seeks Testimony from DOJ Whistleblower
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ne...




---

III. Contextual Records: The “Arctic Frost” Subpoenas

This document provides the context for the confusion regarding “subpoenas signed by Judge Boasberg,” which targeted Congressional phone records, not the President.

11. Senate Judiciary Committee: Letter Regarding “Arctic Frost” Nondisclosure Orders
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/downl...