Скачать или смотреть Should You Make Constants in Singletons Static in Java?

Explore the advantages of making constants static in singleton classes in Java, including insights on memory management and performance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76749378/ asked by the user 'Luca Blanchi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/22140292/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76750348/ provided by the user 'Andreas Lundgren' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2889165/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Should one make constants in singletons static in java?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Should You Make Constants in Singletons Static in Java?

In Java, singletons are design patterns that restrict a class to only one instance while providing a global access point to that instance. A common question among developers is whether constants within singleton classes should be defined as static. In this post, we will dive into this question and explore the implications of making constants static in singleton classes.

Understanding the Singleton Pattern

Before diving into constants, let's briefly revisit what a singleton is:

Singleton Class: A class that ensures only one instance is created and provides a global point of access to that instance.

Use Cases: Configuration settings, logging, or any scenario where shared state is needed across multiple parts of an application.

The Question at Hand

The question arises: should constants in singleton classes be declared as static? There are several factors to consider regarding this practice, primarily focusing on intent and memory management.

Intent and Clarity

Declaring constants as static can convey the following intents:

Global Access: The constant is not tied to any particular instance but is available across all instances.

Indication of Immutability: If the constant is final, it indicates that it will not change once initialized, making it a true constant.

However, there are deeper nuances regarding memory management and access patterns we should examine.

Memory Management: Heap vs. Metaspace

One critical aspect of this discussion is understanding how memory management works when you use static versus non-static fields. Here’s the breakdown:

Static Constants

Storage Location: Static constants are stored in the Metaspace area (part of memory that stores class metadata).

Memory Benefits: Using static final for a small data type means it can often be inlined directly into the calling code. This results in faster access—potentially stored in the instruction memory itself, allowing for rapid retrieval.

Non-Static Constants

Storage Location: Non-static constants are stored on the heap in the instance of the singleton class.

Memory Overhead: Each time an instance is created, a copy of the non-static constant is needed on the heap, as it belongs to the instance.

When to Use Static Final Constants

Small Data Types: If you have small, primitive values as constants, using static final is recommended for optimal performance. They can be accessed in one clock cycle during execution.

Large Data Sets: For larger data types, making them static avoids unnecessary data copying, ensuring only one version exists in Metaspace.

Conclusions

Based on the above considerations, here are the takeaways:

Declare Constants as Static Final: There’s generally no reason not to declare constants in singleton classes as static final. It improves memory efficiency and intent clarity.

Performance Optimizations: Smaller data types are particularly well-suited for static usage, while larger datasets benefit from the reduced data copies in memory.

In conclusion, leveraging static final for constants in singleton classes can enhance performance and maintain clarity in your code. Remember, a byte saved is a byte earned.

Keep these insights in mind as you design your singleton implementations in Java!