Скачать или смотреть Understanding Mono.zip vs flatMap in Reactor: A Deep Dive into Parallel Service Calls

Explore the differences between `Mono.zip` and `flatMap` in Project Reactor when calling multiple services in parallel. Improve your understanding of reactive programming in Java with this comprehensive guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75722397/ asked by the user 'wrm' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1001490/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75722704/ provided by the user 'Emanuel Trandafir' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12706564/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Reactor Mono zip+map vs flatMap/Map

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Mono.zip vs flatMap in Reactor: A Deep Dive into Parallel Service Calls

When working with asynchronous programming in Java, particularly with Project Reactor, developers often face the challenge of making multiple calls to different services in parallel and processing their results. This is a common scenario when developing microservices, where a single request may require results from various other services. In this guide, we'll explore the differences between using Mono.zip and flatMap for these use cases, helping you understand when to use each and the implications of your choice.

The Problem: Making Concurrent Service Calls

Let's say you have three services that provide different pieces of information and you need to call them in parallel. Here’s a quick example of how you can set this up using Mono:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Now, you have two approaches to wait for all responses when using the results from these calls.

Option 1: Using Mono.zip

One way to aggregate the results is by using Mono.zip, which combines multiple Mono instances into one. This is how it looks:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Option 2: Using flatMap

Alternatively, you could nest the calls using flatMap, which involves chaining operations as they complete:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Solution: Understanding the Differences

Performance Considerations

It's essential to note that, from a performance perspective, there shouldn't be a significant difference between these two approaches. Both methods allow you to call the services concurrently, and they complete as soon as all the calls are finished. However, the choice between them might depend on your specific use case and personal preference.

A Practical Example with Simulated Delay

To illustrate this, let's simulate delays in service calls and examine how we can test our methods. Here’s an example of how to create a method that simulates an asynchronous operation with a delay:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You can then create a test method to see both approaches in action:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In conclusion, both Mono.zip and flatMap can be used effectively to handle multiple asynchronous service calls in parallel. The main differences lie in the approach and readability of your code. Using Mono.zip can simplify combining multiple results whereby flatMap offers a more nested and controlled approach. The best choice often depends on the complexity of your operations and your team's coding standards.

Make sure to experiment with these concepts in your applications to find the best fit for your use case. Happy coding!