Explore the concepts of row level locking in databases, how it relates to ACID compliance, and the implications of optimistic versus pessimistic concurrency models.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64517440/ asked by the user 'Ridhwaan Shakeel' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3577482/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64520120/ provided by the user 'Laurenz Albe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6464308/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: In databases, is row level locking an example of ACID, optimistic concurrency, or both?
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Row Level Locking in Databases: ACID or Optimistic Concurrency?
When dealing with databases, especially in multi-user environments, one common concern arises: how do we ensure data integrity while allowing multiple operations to occur simultaneously? One technique that comes into play is row level locking. In this guide, we will dive deep into the question of whether row level locking exemplifies ACID principles, optimistic concurrency, or both.
The Challenge: Simultaneous Writes
In environments where multiple transactions occur simultaneously, data integrity can be threatened. Consider a scenario where two users attempt to modify the same database row at the same time:
User A wants to update the details of a customer.
User B simultaneously tries to change the same customer's data.
Without an effective locking mechanism, these intersecting operations could lead to inconsistent and erroneous data.
The Solution: Row Level Locking
What is Row Level Locking?
Row level locking is a strategy used primarily in relational databases to provide isolation, which represents the "I" in ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability). This isolation is essential for maintaining the integrity of concurrent transactions.
How It Works
When User A starts a transaction to update a row, the database locks that specific row.
User B, upon attempting to update the same row, will have to wait until User A completes their transaction.
This mechanism ensures that:
Only one transaction modifies a specific row at any given time.
Data inconsistencies are prevented as transactions don't interfere with each other.
The ACID Connection
In our discussion of databases, the ACID properties ensure reliable processing of database transactions:
Atomicity: Transactions are fully completed or not executed at all.
Consistency: Transactions must leave the database in a valid state.
Isolation: Transactions do not see the intermediate state of other transactions.
Durability: Once a transaction is committed, it remains so, even in the case of a system failure.
Row level locking directly supports the Isolation aspect of ACID by ensuring that transactions are isolated from one another, thus preventing what is known as lost updates and dirty reads.
Pessimistic vs. Optimistic Locking
Pessimistic Locking
Row level locking falls under pessimistic locking, characterized by its safety-first approach:
Locks are placed on a row before any data manipulation occurs.
The mindset is one of caution: "I expect someone will try to modify this data, so I will prevent that from happening."
The SQL command often used for this is:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Optimistic Locking
In contrast, optimistic locking adopts a more relaxed approach:
No locks are placed when starting a transaction.
Instead, the system only checks if the row has been changed before applying the final updates.
If a change is detected, it typically retries the operation.
While both strategies aim to safeguard data integrity, they do so in fundamentally different ways.
Looking Beyond Relational Databases: The NoSQL Perspective
While this discussion primarily focuses on relational databases, it is important to note that NoSQL databases like Amazon DynamoDB have different concurrency handling mechanisms. However, the complexity of that topic would require more extensive examination, which is beyond the scope of our discussion here.
Conclusion
In summary, row level locking is an effective technique within relational databases that exemplifies the Isolation aspect of ACID. It operates under a pessimistic concurrency model, ensuring that tr
Информация по комментариям в разработке