Скачать или смотреть Meta-analytic structural Equation Modeling: The Super Tool for Settling Debates

Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling (MASEM) is reshaping how we understand relationships in management. Here’s why it matters:

1️⃣ Integrating Meta-Analysis and SEM Enhances Insights: MASEM combines meta-analysis with structural equation modeling to test competing theoretical models. This allows researchers to explore mediation and interaction effects that traditional meta-analysis cannot capture.
2️⃣ More Comprehensive Frameworks: By analyzing cumulative research, MASEM enables comparisons of theoretical models, such as contrasting agency theory and resource dependence models. This leads to a deeper understanding of complex relationships, like strategic leadership's impact on performance.
3️⃣ Addresses Limitations of Traditional Meta-Analysis: Unlike bivariate meta-analysis, MASEM evaluates entire model structures, accounting for interdependencies among variables. This approach reduces oversimplifications and uncovers nuanced pathways in strategic relationships.
4️⃣ Challenges with Causality and Endogeneity: MASEM does not eliminate issues of causality or endogeneity but provides tools to compare models and identify the most plausible explanations. Future applications can incorporate experimental designs to strengthen causal inferences.
5️⃣ A Roadmap for Future Research: MASEM offers a methodology for refining strategic management theories, particularly those related to leadership, governance, and organizational performance. The process promotes transparency and cumulative knowledge, setting the stage for transformative research.

Strategic insights demand rigorous methodologies. How are you leveraging innovative tools like MASEM in your research?

Get article: Bergh, D. D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C. Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., Su, P., Lau, C., & Joo, H. 2016. Using meta-analytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3): 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2338