Скачать или смотреть Systemic Paralysis vs. Factory for Certainty: The West's Innovation Crisis

Western Vetocracy & Financialization vs. Eastern System Design.
This analysis contrasts two models of technological innovation using medical AI.
Western Model:
Systemic paralysis driven by vetocracy (excessive veto points).
Financialization prioritizes speculative returns over physical deployment.
Result: High friction, low velocity, inhibits building.
Eastern Model (China's National AI Medical Pilot Base):
A factory for certainty through coherent, centralized system design.
Integrates research, testing, regulation, and deployment (1+5+6+N framework).
Prioritizes administrative excellence, policy endurance, and velocity.
Conclusion: The contest is system fragmentation vs. coherence. Physical capacity to build and test is the new measure of national power.

Summarizes a comparison between Western and Eastern approaches to technological innovation, specifically in medical AI. The main claim is that the West is suffering from vetocracy and financialization, which prioritize procedure and speculative returns, leading to systemic paralysis, while the East, exemplified by China's National AI Medical Pilot Testing Base, is building a factory for certainty through coherent, centralized system design that prioritizes velocity and administrative excellence. The logic is that the Western system, characterized by numerous veto points (vetocracy) and a focus on financializing ideas, creates friction and prevents the physical deployment of innovation. In contrast, the Eastern system, using frameworks like the 1+5+6+N model, integrates research, testing, regulation, and deployment into a single, coherent structure, eliminating bottlenecks and achieving policy endurance and velocity. This difference is framed as a contest of system design: fragmentation versus coherence, where the physical capacity to build and test (infrastructure) is argued to be the new measure of national power.