Скачать или смотреть How to Efficiently Translate a LOOP into a DO in a Common Lisp Macro

Discover how to effectively convert a `LOOP` structure into `DO` in Common Lisp, simplifying your macro code for cleaner iteration.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75162167/ asked by the user 'AVALFINN' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14713854/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75162502/ provided by the user 'Barmar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1491895/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to translate a LOOP into a DO inside a macro (common lisp)?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Efficiently Translate a LOOP into a DO in a Common Lisp Macro

When working with Common Lisp, particularly while creating macros, developers often need to iterate over lists or collections. An example of this is translating a LOOP structure into a DO structure for better efficiency and readability. If you've ever felt lost trying to perform such transformations, you're not alone! In this post, we'll explore how to achieve this with practical examples, helping you understand the differences and advantages of using DO over LOOP.

The Initial Problem: Translating a LOOP into a DO

Consider the following macro that allows you to check conditions using LOOP:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the example above, the check macro evaluates various forms by applying the do-stuff function. Your goal is to replace the LOOP with a DO, but you may be unsure of how to structure it correctly or if there's a more efficient way to do so.

Understanding the DO Structure

The DO construct in Lisp is a versatile iteration construct that can replace certain LOOP usages, particularly when dealing with lists. The idea is not to iterate over indexes but directly over the elements of the list, which can lead to clearer and more maintainable code.

Basic DO Translation

Here’s how you can implement the DO version of your check macro:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example:

l is initialized with forms, and it iterates through the list using (cdr l).

accumulator collects the results, which are reversed at the end for the correct order.

Improvements with DO* and Other Constructs

You can also utilize DO* to simplify the code even further, allowing you to define a variable for the current form being processed:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This version mimics the functionality of the original LOOP while using DO* for definition clarity.

Exploring Alternative Approaches

If you're looking for even cleaner solutions, consider the following built-in approaches:

Using dolist: This method simplifies iteration:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using mapcar: If you only need to transform the list without accumulating results, mapcar can be succinct:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Iteration Construct

Choosing between LOOP, DO, dolist, or mapcar depends on your specific use case and preferences in writing readable, maintainable code. While LOOP can be very powerful, translating it to DO can yield cleaner and more efficient results. As you continue to work with Common Lisp, keep experimenting with different constructs to refine your coding style.

By gaining a deeper understanding of DO, you can enhance your Lisp projects' performance and clarity!