Скачать или смотреть 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼-𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 — 𝗼𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗙𝗢𝗠𝗢?

𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼-𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 — 𝗼𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗙𝗢𝗠𝗢?

Micro-frontends gained popularity as teams tried to scale frontend development across multiple autonomous teams. At very large organizations, this still makes sense. Independent deployments, clear ownership, and parallel development can outweigh the added complexity.
However, industry sentiment has clearly shifted from 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗵𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 to 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.

𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆:
• 𝗪𝗲𝗯𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗙𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 remains the most stable and widely used runtime-sharing solution.
• 𝗩𝗶𝘁𝗲 + 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗹𝗲 𝗙𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝗴𝗶𝗻𝘀 offer faster builds and better DX, but are still maturing in large production systems.
• 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲-𝗦𝗽𝗮 is now mostly used for legacy or multi-framework orchestration, not greenfield apps.

𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
• Code duplication and dependency version drift
• Increased infra and CI/CD complexity
• Authentication, SSO, and routing are becoming cross-app concerns
• Higher cognitive load for developers

The trend of '𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻' is fading. We are seeing more honest retrospectives and blogs from teams who chose them solely for the buzzword, only to regret the decision later once the operational overhead became a bottleneck.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗼𝗺 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲: If you do choose this path, rigorous architectural oversight is non-negotiable. Without high-level governance to prevent code redundancy, you risk building a 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗵 that is even harder to maintain and debug.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿: Micro-frontends are not a default architecture. They are a targeted solution for specific organizational constraints.
For many teams, alternatives like well-structured 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀 (𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼/𝗡𝘅) and 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 deliver 80% of the benefits without the operational overhead.

The question is no longer: “𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼-𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀?” It’s: “𝗗𝗼 𝘄𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺?”

#𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 #𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 #𝗪𝗲𝗯𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 #𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 #𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 #𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗗𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 #𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 #𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴