Скачать или смотреть Why is it Easier to Render a Mesh with High Detail than to Create an Irregular Collider?

Discover why rendering high-poly meshes is less problematic than constructing complex colliders in game development, especially in environments like Unity.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72874550/ asked by the user 'Jonathon Reilly' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19316595/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72926106/ provided by the user 'John Haggerty' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19222764/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why is it easier to render a mesh with potentially tens of thousands of vertices, UV mapping, materials, etc than it is to make an irregular collider?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why is it Easier to Render a Mesh with High Detail than to Create an Irregular Collider?

In the world of game development, particularly when working with engines like Unity, developers often encounter a perplexing issue: Why is it so much simpler to render a high-poly mesh—which can contain tens of thousands of vertices, UV mapping, and various materials—compared to creating an irregular collider? This question touches on the heart of performance concerns and the complexities of collision detection in games. Let's dive into this topic to unravel the reasons behind this seeming paradox.

Understanding the Challenge

When we talk about colliders in game development, we are referring to the invisible shapes that are used to define the physical boundaries of game objects. Surprisingly, while high-poly meshes can be rendered effortlessly, colliders are typically limited to simpler shapes such as cuboids, spheres, or capsules. This raises an important question: Why do we see these restrictions when it seems feasible to represent every detail of a mesh?

The Performance Paradox

Graphics vs. Physics

Power of GPUs: One of the primary reasons is the sheer power of Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). They are specifically optimized for rendering graphics at high levels of detail. In contrast, there isn’t a similar hardware specialization for collision detection.

Rendering Pipeline: The rendering process has undergone significant optimization to handle intricate meshes effectively, making detailed rendering seem almost seamless.

The Complexity of Collision Detection

When considering collision detection, simply rendering the mesh isn’t enough. The complexity increases with the level of detail in the meshes involved, particularly in the following ways:

Quadratic Increase in Calculations: As objects become more detailed, the number of potential collision checks escalates dramatically. For example, if two objects each have 100 triangles, the calculation for possible collisions rises to 10,000 checks (100 triangles * 100 triangles). This quadratic escalation can become burdensome quickly.

Spatial Partitioning: While techniques like spatial partitioning can help manage these calculations, they add layers of complexity. For static objects, collision checks could be simplified, but dynamic interactions often require detailed assessments of overlaps and contact points, especially when objects rest on surfaces.

Complex Player Physics: Player collisions introduce another layer of complexity. As the collision geometry grows intricate, the code managing player movement must be increasingly sophisticated to prevent the character from feeling "sticky" against surfaces, which can exponentially escalate the workload involved in collision detection.

Simplifying Solutions

Why Not Keep It Simple?

Gameplay Efficiency: Often, maintaining simpler collision shapes suffices for achieving good gameplay experiences. Using basic forms like spheres or capsules can enhance smoothness and performance, enabling developers to allocate processing power to other critical areas of the game.

Gliding Mechanics: Simple geometrical shapes, such as capsules and cylinders, can facilitate smoother gliding over surfaces, improving player satisfaction and interaction without the need for complex calculations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the complexity and performance concerns associated with irregular colliders stand in stark contrast to the ease of rendering high-poly meshes. As game developers, embracing simpler collision shapes can not only enhance performance but also contribute to overall gameplay qual