Mastering contract negotiations and dispute differences Denmark, Germany, Norway, Lithuania

Negotiating complex international contracts can be challenging. One clause that is of major importance to the parties of the contract is the dispute resolution clause. One reason for this is that there are clearly different preferences in different countries. In some countries, the preference is for arbitration, in other for litigation. In some countries, the SCC is the norm, but not always.

Take the opportunity to gain valuable insights into regional nuances, industry trends, and the evolving preferences in dispute resolution services. We discuss the preferences and trends in dispute resolution in Norway, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania and Sweden. You will gain a good understanding of the prevailing preferences and arguments used in these regions. Connect with in-house counsels, private practitioners, and other legal professionals shaping the norther European dispute resolution landscape.

Key Topics:
User preferences to dispute resolution services
Choices between litigation and arbitration
Prevalence of ad hoc arbitrations
Various types of disputes encountered

Speakers:
Sven Lange, Partner, Busse Disputes, Germany
Ramunas Audzevicius, Partner, Motieka, Lithuania
Knud Knudsen, Partner, Simonsen Vogt Wiig, Norway
Henriette Gernaa, Partner, Gorrissen Federspiel, Denmark

Moderator:
Caroline Falconer, Secretary General, SCC Arbitration Institute

Any questions? Please contact [email protected].