Скачать или смотреть Finding the Most Efficient Way to Model Access Patterns in DynamoDB for Animal Movement Tracking

Discover more efficient strategies for managing access patterns in Amazon DynamoDB, focusing on animal movement tracking between fields with a smart data modeling approach using Global Secondary Indexes (GSI).
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62764655/ asked by the user 'beevor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8411122/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62764892/ provided by the user 'Dennis Traub' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/158668/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Is there a better way to model this access pattern than to use two global secondary indexes (GSI)?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

When designing a data model for an application intended to track animal movements between different pastures, the challenge often lies in efficiently retrieving the necessary data without incurring high costs or performance bottlenecks. In this scenario, the goal is to collect data on the movement of animals into and out of specific fields, while minimizing the complexity of queries and the number of indexes required.

In this guide, we will discuss potential modeling strategies for tracking animal movements in Amazon DynamoDB, particularly focusing on whether it’s possible to simplify the use of multiple Global Secondary Indexes (GSI).

The Problem

In our case, we want to be able to query records for a specific field (e.g., FIELD# A) and retrieve the following information:

The date of the movement

The fields the animals moved to and from

The number of animals involved in each movement

Given a sample dataset, one might initially think of using multiple GSIs to handle queries for both movements into and out of a specific field. However, this approach can lead to unnecessary complexity and overhead.

The data representation for animal movements might look something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

As you can see, both "from" and "to" movements need to be modeled in a way that allows us to efficiently query and aggregate the relevant data.

Exploring Solutions

First Attempt - GSI with PK=FROM, SK=TO
This approach allows querying movements from a field, but not to it, so it doesn't satisfy the requirement.

Second Attempt - Composite Attribute as PK in GSI
Using a composite key like FIELD# A# FIELD# B also limits visibility to only one direction of movement and leads to the same issue as the first attempt.

Third Attempt - Utilizing Two GSIs
Implementing a GSI for PK=FROM and another for PK=TO allows us to gather partial results. However, it requires two queries and additional processing, which is not the most efficient.

Fourth Attempt - Scanning and Filtering
This method is less desirable due to potential inefficiencies, particularly if the dataset grows large—imagine scanning through 50,000+ records!

A More Efficient Table Structure

The good news is that there's a better way to achieve our goals:

Revised Data Model

By rethinking our data structure, we can simplify the problem:

New Table Structure

Partition Key (PK): ANIMALID

Sort Key (SK): FIELDID

Here’s how the new layout would be:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

New GSI Structure

GSI PK: FIELDID

GSI SK: ANIMALID

With this approach, you can easily query the GSI using just the FIELDID, allowing for straightforward aggregation of results based on the FROM_TO field.

Conclusion

In summary, rather than using multiple Global Secondary Indexes for tracking animal movements, the revised data structure promotes efficiency and clarity. This solution allows for effective querying while minimizing backend complexity. By using the ANIMALID and FIELDID as keys, along with a well-defined GSI, you can accurately track movements in and out of any given field without the overhead of unnecessary queries.

Key Takeaway: Always consider restructuring your data model to simplify queries and improve efficiency!