Logo video2dn
  • Сохранить видео с ютуба
  • Категории
    • Музыка
    • Кино и Анимация
    • Автомобили
    • Животные
    • Спорт
    • Путешествия
    • Игры
    • Люди и Блоги
    • Юмор
    • Развлечения
    • Новости и Политика
    • Howto и Стиль
    • Diy своими руками
    • Образование
    • Наука и Технологии
    • Некоммерческие Организации
  • О сайте

Скачать или смотреть The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part?

  • Ozma's Dad
  • 2023-11-26
  • 215
The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part?
  • ok logo

Скачать The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part? бесплатно в качестве 4к (2к / 1080p)

У нас вы можете скачать бесплатно The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part? или посмотреть видео с ютуба в максимальном доступном качестве.

Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:

  • Информация по загрузке:

Cкачать музыку The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part? бесплатно в формате MP3:

Если иконки загрузки не отобразились, ПОЖАЛУЙСТА, НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если у вас возникли трудности с загрузкой, пожалуйста, свяжитесь с нами по контактам, указанным в нижней части страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса video2dn.com

Описание к видео The Marvels SUCKS, but What Was the Worst Part?

Ozma's Dad takes a crack at the latest Marvel Cinematic Universe blockDUSTER from Disney. Everything about The Marvels sucks, but what was the worst part?

An explanation of how the figures given in this video were arrived at:

There's a lot of numbers going around as to what The Marvels actually cost to produce, and promote. To be generous I discounted promotion, and rounded the cost of production down to a mere 200 million dollars. I did it the extra kindness of adjusting for inflation to the year 2019 when the project was announced rather than the subsequent years in which it was produced. This was more of a kindness to myself to be honest. As everyone knows, the rate of inflation increased quite a bit from month to month. I wouldn't know where to start figuring out what was spent, or when.

Another simplification is the use of the consumer price index. (probably a very understated measure of inflation) It's just a comparison of relative purchasing power for the US dollar over time. For this case It doesn't take into account the specific differences in the cost of labour, International or domestic production, the technology or methods used, the cost of insurance, what have you. It's based on an arbitrary basket of goods for the whole of the United States of America rather than a basket of goods specific to Hollywood. So yeah, no cocaine deflation.To generously account for this as best as I could, I heavily rounded down all the results. So, for example:

Star Trek 2 had a budget of $12,000,000 in 1982. In 2019 that would be the equivalent of $33,750,099. That would go into two-hundred million 5.92 times, so I rounded all the way down to 5 even though it was very nearly 6.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео

  • О нас
  • Контакты
  • Отказ от ответственности - Disclaimer
  • Условия использования сайта - TOS
  • Политика конфиденциальности

video2dn Copyright © 2023 - 2025

Контакты для правообладателей [email protected]