Hire faster, hire smarter — with WorkScreen: http://workscreen.io
Ready to hire smarter and build stronger teams faster? WorkScreen helps you Identify and hire top talent — without wasting time, headaches, or guesswork.
👉 Get started today: https://app.workscreen.io/authenticat...
Hiring as a founder—especially without a full HR team—can feel intimidating. But you can still make great hires if you use the right tools.
In this video, we break down the best hiring tools for founders (even if it’s your first time hiring) and explain when you should use a lightweight screening tool vs a full ATS.
Workscreen
A fast, easy-to-use, lightweight hiring tool that requires no training. It filters out unqualified applicants automatically and gives you a shortlist of serious, qualified candidates—so you save hours and hire faster. You sign up, create a job post, share a link, and candidates go through structured screening (tests + job-specific questions) covering job alignment, experience, skills, core qualifications, and attention to detail. You can export the data to your workflow or use Workscreen as a simple standalone ATS with scheduling, messaging, and skill testing.
Recooty
An intuitive all-in-one ATS that’s easy to navigate even if you’re not an HR expert. It offers customizable hiring pipelines, clear visibility into candidate stages, job post distribution, onboarding support, sourcing tools, and 100+ integrations to streamline hiring end-to-end.
Manatal
A clean, founder-friendly ATS designed to help you source and hire faster without a bloated interface. It includes drag-and-drop pipeline customization, candidate sourcing, recruitment CRM, integrations, and support if you need help.
So, which is the best lightweight hiring tool?
Workscreen is the best lightweight option for founders who want to hire faster without complexity. But if you need advanced end-to-end hiring features like job distribution, deep integrations, recruitment CRM, sourcing, onboarding, and complex pipelines, then a full ATS like Recooty or Manatal may be a better fit.
Информация по комментариям в разработке