Скачать или смотреть Crafting a Custom Assignment Operator for Standard Library Classes in C++

Learn how to create a `custom assignment operator` in C++ for your class requirements while keeping code clarity in mind.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/74955499/ asked by the user 'prestokeys' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3089350/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/74955681/ provided by the user '463035818_is_not_an_ai' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4117728/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Custom assignment operator on standard library classes

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Custom Assignment Operator for Standard Library Classes in C++

When working with C++, we often encounter scenarios where we want to manipulate data structures intuitively. One common requirement is assigning values between different types of collections, specifically when we want to selectively extract elements from one container to another. For instance, imagine you have a std::vector of pairs, and you want to populate another std::vector with only the second components of those pairs.

Let's take a look at a specific example and determine whether it's possible to achieve this with a custom assignment operator.

The Problem

In C++, one might expect to perform the following assignment:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, this raises the question: Is such a custom assignment possible? The short answer is No when it comes to directly overloading the assignment operator for std::vector.

Understanding Assignment Operators

Why Overloading = is Restricted

The assignment operator = can only be implemented as a member function of a class. Since std::vector is part of the standard library, you cannot add or modify its members to overload the assignment operator for your specific needs.

Here are the main points to remember:

You cannot add member functions to std types, including std::vector.

Attempting to overload operators for std types will lead to compiler errors.

A Possible Workaround

While directly overloading the assignment operator for std::vector isn't an option, you can achieve similar functionality by creating a wrapper or a custom structure that defines an assignment operator. Below is an illustrative example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breaking Down the Code

Wrapper Structure: pick_second_vector_ref is created to wrap around a reference to std::vector<int>. This allows us to define a custom assignment operator where we can specify what happens when we assign another type to it.

Template Function: The operator overload is defined as a templated function, allowing it to work with any source type that can be iterated over, making it flexible.

Processing the Input: Within the operator, we iterate over the source and push the second elements of the pairs into the vector t.

Functionality versus Clarity

While this solution technically allows for the desired assignment behavior, it may introduce clarity issues in your code. Instead of relying on an overloaded operator that could lead to confusion, consider using a named function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In summary, while you cannot overload the assignment operator directly on std::vector in C++, creating a custom wrapper structure can achieve similar results. However, for clarity and maintainability, consider using explicit functions that communicate the intent behind your code better than operator overloading ever could.

Remember, as our code will be read more often than it is written, it’s essential to emphasize clarity. Writing concise, understandable code will save you and others time in the long run.