Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Necessity of flush in Angular Testing: Click vs. triggerEventHandler

Dive deep into Angular testing specifics, focusing on the use of `flush` in handling clicks versus using `triggerEventHandler` for effective integration testing.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64431070/ asked by the user 'Oriol Miró' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8526764/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64443755/ provided by the user 'Lars Gyrup Brink Nielsen' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1071200/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Angular testing why is flush necessary when clicking but not in triggerEventHandler

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Necessity of flush in Angular Testing: Click vs. triggerEventHandler

In the realm of Angular testing, developers often encounter nuances that can make or break their test cases. One such nuance revolves around the usage of flush when simulating user interactions, particularly clicking elements. This guide aims to clarify why flush is necessary when conducting tests on click events but not when using triggerEventHandler.

The Problem: Navigating through Components

Imagine you have an Angular module that consists of a list, card, detail, and edit components. A common requirement is to test that clicking on a card leads the user to the appropriate detail page or that clicking a button takes them to an edit page.

Here's a concise look at the common testing scenario:

Scenario 1: Clicking on a card navigates to a detail page.

Scenario 2: Clicking the "Create" button navigates to an edit page.

While testing each of these interactions, you might notice differing behaviors with your test results depending on whether you simulate clicks directly or use the triggerEventHandler function. In particular, failure to use flush in one scenario can lead to issues like "1 periodic timer(s) still in the queue."

Solutions: Understanding flush, tick, and the Event Handlers

Core Concepts

Before delving into the reason behind the need for flush in certain situations, let’s clarify a few terms:

flushMicrotasks: This method flushes pending microtasks.

tick: This method flushes pending microtasks and also progresses time in the context of fakeAsync.

flush: This method flushes pending microtasks, macrotasks, and advances time, all while operating within fakeAsync.

Why Does flush Matter?

Native Events vs. Command Events:

When a native event (like a click) occurs, it is treated as a macrotask. This means that Angular schedules this action in the macro queue and processes it on the next tick.

Conversely, using triggerEventHandler or EventEmitters without async set to true operates at the microtask level.

Impact on Test Execution:

In the first test where you click the card, since it’s a native event, you may need to use tick() to allow Angular to process the resulting navigation event. The addition of flush() ensures all tasks, including those queued in the macro queue, are executed properly.

The scenario works as intended when using flush because it handles all pending tasks before the assertion is made, thus eliminating the "1 periodic timer(s) still in the queue" error.

When testing with triggerEventHandler, since it deals with microtasks, the need for flush decreases, and the tests can run successfully without it.

Final Takeaways

Here are some essential points to remember when writing Angular tests:

Use flush when dealing with native events to ensure all macrotasks and microtasks are fully processed before assertions.

If you're using triggerEventHandler, often you can successfully avoid using flush, as Angular already processes microtasks efficiently.

Always check the type of event and how your Angular application manages tasks to decide whether flush is needed.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between how Angular handles macrotasks and microtasks is crucial for effective integration testing. The necessity of using flush can significantly alter the outcome of your tests. Being aware of these nuances will enhance your Angular testing strategies and lead to more reliable outcomes.

Embrace these concepts, and you'll be navigating Angular testing with confidence in no time!