Скачать или смотреть Understanding cross_val_score vs cross_val_predict in Machine Learning

Explore the differences between `cross_val_score` and `cross_val_predict` in machine learning, including their implications on evaluation metrics and results consistency when using scikit-learn.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66034846/ asked by the user 'Stavros Koureas' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2123099/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66035707/ provided by the user 'Ben Reiniger' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10495893/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: MachineLearning cross_val_score vs cross_val_predict

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding cross_val_score vs cross_val_predict in Machine Learning

Machine learning practitioners often face the challenge of evaluating model performance accurately. Two commonly used methods for this purpose in scikit-learn are cross_val_score and cross_val_predict. However, users may notice discrepancies in the results produced by these two functions. In this guide, we will explore the differences between these two approaches and discuss why their outputs may vary, providing a clearer understanding for those working on model evaluation.

The Problem at Hand

When developing a generic evaluation tool, a user observed that the mean of scores computed with cross_val_score.mean() presented slightly different results compared to those generated by cross_val_predict. This inconsistency raised questions about how each function processes data and computes performance metrics.

For example, the user calculated the testing score with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

And for true positives (tp), false positives (fp), true negatives (tn), and false negatives (fn), they used:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The resulting score from both methods led to slight variations that sparked curiosity. Why did this happen?

The Solution: Understanding the Differences

Both cross_val_score and cross_val_predict are part of scikit-learn’s model evaluation toolkit, but they serve distinct purposes and operate differently:

What Does Each Function Do?

cross_val_score: This function performs k-fold cross-validation, returning an array of scores based on a scoring function (e.g., accuracy) for each fold. Then, it calculates the mean of these scores, resulting in a single performance metric for the entire model.

cross_val_predict: This function also performs k-fold cross-validation but instead of returning scores, it generates predictions for each instance in the dataset, where each instance's prediction is made by a model that has not been trained on that instance.

Why the Results Differ

Grouping of Data: The initial quote from the user's exploration points out that elements are grouped differently in these two methods. This means that the way predictions are made in cross_val_predict can lead to different metrics being calculated compared to those computed using the scores from cross_val_score.

Metric Sensitivity: The chosen evaluation metric can also influence how results are interpreted. In this case, the user's metric is accuracy, which can be decomposed over samples. However, if the sizes of test folds are not equal, slight differences can occur when aggregating metrics.

Total Size of the Dataset: The dataset size can also play a role; if the total size is not highly divisible by the number of folds, it can lead to imbalanced fold sizes, impacting the accuracy slightly.

Conclusion

In summary, while both cross_val_score and cross_val_predict are valuable tools for evaluating machine learning models, it's essential to understand their workings and differences. The slight discrepancies observed in results often stem from how each function processes data, the metrics used, and the characteristics of the dataset itself.

By being aware of these differences, practitioners can make more informed decisions when choosing the appropriate method for model evaluation, ultimately leading to more reliable assessments of their algorithms.

If you're interested in improving your model evaluation practices, consider experimenting with both methods to identify what works best for your specific project. Happy coding!