Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Java Concurrency Issue: Why Synchronized Might Not Work

Discover why your `Java` concurrency code may not yield expected results and how to fix it effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63824528/ asked by the user 'kalasag' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14049227/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63825117/ provided by the user 'Morph21' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7406338/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Java Concurrency Synchronized not working

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Java Concurrency Issue: Why Synchronized Might Not Work

Concurrency in Java can sometimes feel tricky, especially when synchronization doesn't seem to work as expected. If you're navigating through issues with synchronized methods in Java, you're not alone. Today, we'll dive into a specific example where Java's concurrency control via synchronized methods doesn't produce the expected outcome – and we'll clarify how to correct it.

The Problem: Unexpected Results from Synchronized Methods

Consider the case where you have a simple Counter class with synchronized methods for incrementing and decrementing a counter variable. Here’s how your code might look:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What’s Going Wrong?

When you run this code, it surprisingly prints 1 instead of 0. While it seems like the increment and decrement methods should counteract each other to give a final count of 0, they don't because the main thread prints the counter value before the threads have completed their operations. Asynchronous operations and the timing of thread execution can lead to unexpected results.

The Solution: Ensuring Proper Synchronization and Thread Management

1. Utilizing Thread.join() Method

The primary solution to this problem is to ensure that the main thread waits for the completion of the threads it started before checking the counter value. This can be done using the join() method. Here’s how you can modify your Main class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Ensuring Synchronization on Shared Methods

Moreover, it's essential to ensure that all shared methods that are accessed by multiple threads are synchronized. In this scenario, the increment() and decrement() methods already use synchronized, so they are safe. However, if you were to create new methods that access or modify shared data (like a count), they would also need the synchronized keyword to avoid race conditions.

Why Synchronization Matters

Synchronization is core to thread safety and helps you preserve the integrity of shared data while multiple threads are executing. In concurrent programming, without proper synchronization, you might encounter issues like inconsistent data and incorrect results.

Conclusion: Control Your Concurrency with Confidence

Understanding and applying Java concurrency principles such as synchronized methods and thread management with join(), you can steer clear of erratic behavior in your applications. Testing your code thoroughly after these changes will help you reach the expected results and maintain the integrity of your data within concurrent environments.

With these insights, you'll be better equipped to handle concurrency in your Java applications. Happy coding!