The Truth About Pompeii's Destruction And "Preserved Bodies"

Описание к видео The Truth About Pompeii's Destruction And "Preserved Bodies"

Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! Support freedom and get your prefered content!:
   / @metatronyt  

Also if you like what I do and wish to support my work to help me make sure that I can continue to tell it how it is please consider checking out my patreon! Unboxings are Patreon exclusives!
  / themetatron  

“Pompaia, on the River Sarnus — a river which both takes the cargoes inland and sends them out
to sea — is the port-town of Nola, Nuceria, and Acherrae”
Strabone, Geografia, IV, 8

Contents of this video
Intro
1 – Factors in the Establishment of Pompeii
2 - Volcanic Proximity: Risk-Benefit Analysis in Ancient Urban Planning
3 – Cataclysmic Tephrochronology: The Vesuvian Eruption of 79 AD
4 – Contemporary Perspectival Narratives of the Vesuvian Catastrophe
5 – Taphonomic Processes and Anthropogenic Preservation in Pyroclastic Contexts
6 – Historiographical Analysis of Settlement Patterns in Antiquity
7 – Etruscan Cultural Diffusion and its Impact on Campanian Urbanism
8 – Theological Implications and Ritualistic Practices in Pre-Eruption Pompeii
9 – Sociocultural Heterogeneity in a Roman Colonial Context
Conclusion

1 – Factors in the Establishment of Pompeii
Let's begin by well what we know. How did it all start?
Like many cities of the classical world, Pompeii also has its founding myth: according to Servius,
the city was supposedly founded by none other than the demigod Hercules, and its name would
have originated from "a Pompa Herculis," meaning "from the triumph of Hercules." However, the
most recent archaeological discoveries confirm a foundation dating back to around the 8th century
BC by the Oscan people, an Italic tribe, corroborating what Strabo reported in his "Geography."
The Oscans were part of the large linguistic family of Umbro-Sabellian or Osco-Umbrian peoples,
distinct from the Latins, who probably arrived in Italy in the 12th century BC. While some
Hellenists have proposed that the etymology of Pompeii should be sought in the Greek Πεμπo
(Pempo), meaning "to send," due to the thriving commercial activity, the original linguistic root is
likely this Oscan word "pumpè," from which comes the archaic name Pumpàiia.

The Oscan "pumpè," analogous to the Greek "penta" and Latin "quinque," means "five," and most
likely refers to a proto-urban reality formed by the progressive fusion of five distinct residential
centers, five small Oscan villages that were scattered on the southern slopes of mount Vesuvius,
next to the course of the Sarno river.
2. Natural resources: Volcanic areas often provide access to valuable resources like obsidian,
sulfur, and various minerals used in ancient crafts and trade.
3. Lack of geological understanding: Ancient people didn't fully understand the mechanisms of
volcanic eruptions or their potential for catastrophic destruction. The last major eruption of
Vesuvius before 79 AD was likely prehistoric, so there was no living memory of its danger.
4. Infrequent eruptions: Many volcanoes, including Vesuvius, can remain dormant for long
periods. This can create a false sense of security among nearby populations.
5. Strategic location: Pompeii was located in a prime spot for trade, with access to the sea and
inland routes. The benefits of this location may have outweighed perceived risks.
6. Religious and cultural significance: Volcanoes were often seen as sacred in ancient cultures,
associated with deities or supernatural forces. This could make living near them culturally
desirable.
7. Limited mobility: Ancient societies were less mobile than modern ones. Once established, it
was difficult to relocate entire cities, even if dangers became apparent.
8. Economic investments: As cities grew and prospered, the economic and social costs of
abandoning them became increasingly high.
9. Adaptation and mitigation: Over time, societies living near volcanoes often developed
strategies to cope with minor volcanic activity, like earthquakes or ash falls.
10.Lack of alternatives: In some regions, volcanic areas might have been among the best
available locations for settlement, despite the risks.

It's worth noting that while the destruction of Pompeii was catastrophic, the city had thrived for
centuries before the eruption of 79 AD. From the perspective of the ancient inhabitants, the benefits
of their location likely seemed to outweigh the potential for a disaster that might never occur in
their lifetimes.

This balance of risk and reward in choosing settlement locations is not unique to ancient times.
Even today, many major cities are located in areas prone to natural disasters, demonstrating that
humans often prioritize immediate benefits over long-term, uncertain risks

#pompeii #ancientrome #documentary

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке