Скачать или смотреть David Wood OBLITERATES John Fontaine on the Islamic Dilemma: Quran vs Bible Debate EXPOSED

This video breaks down one of the most intense and controversial exchanges between David Wood and John Fontaine as they clash over the Islamic Dilemma, a logical problem that examines whether the Quran confirms the Bible or contradicts it and what that means for the truth claims of Islam. In this analysis, we explore how the discussion escalates when John attempts to argue that small groups of Christians and Jews in Mecca and Medina supposedly preserved the true Torah and Gospel, despite the overwhelming manuscript evidence that the Jewish and Christian scriptures had been widely distributed across the Mediterranean, Africa, and the Middle East for centuries. The commentary highlights how this claim relies entirely on later hadith literature rather than any historical manuscripts, and how John repeatedly asking “Is that in your Bible?” ends up strengthening David Wood’s point by exposing discrepancies between what the Quran describes and what the Bible actually contains. We dive into the deeper tension created when the Quran tells Jews and Christians to judge by “what is WITH them,” a present-tense affirmation that directly contradicts the idea of lost secret scriptures hidden somewhere in Arabia. As David Wood presses the issue, the debate reveals a major theological problem: either the Quran means exactly what it says when it affirms the existing Torah and Gospel, or it requires centuries of scholarly layers to reinterpret its clear statements, raising serious questions about the Quran’s claim to be a perfectly clear revelation. The video also breaks down David’s argument that the Islamic Dilemma stands regardless of whether the Bible is fully preserved, partially corrupted, or even completely uninspired, because the issue lies in what the Quran affirms, not in what Christians must defend. If the Quran endorses scriptures that do not match its descriptions, that contradiction is a problem within Islam itself. This commentary connects the modern debate to historical critiques dating back to early Christian thinkers like John of Damascus who questioned the Quran’s relationship to earlier revelation, showing how this dilemma has been recognized for over a millennium. If you are interested in Islamic apologetics, Christian-Muslim debate, textual criticism, Quranic studies, biblical reliability, or the logical structure behind religious truth claims, this breakdown makes sense of one of the most heated and intellectually demanding debates on the Islamic Dilemma.