The Second Book of Enoch (Human Voice, Read-Along Version)

There are many ways you can help me to bring this message to the world. By subscribing to my channel, along with liking and sharing these videos, you are helping this channel to grow.
SUBSCRIBE HERE:    / apocryphile1970  
My book, The Super Gospel, A Harmony of Ancient Gospels, is available for purchase below. This is not a work of fiction, but a genuine Gospel harmony, comprised of over a hundred ancient Christian sources, laid out in chronological order from the history of Jesus’ parents all the way through his post-resurrection teachings and ascension. The mere fact that it can be done at all is momentous. The fact that it can be made to be so beautiful and fascinating and intricate is a testament to the pure genius of God. A link to the full version, compiled, integrated and read by myself, is available here for your listening pleasure:    • The Super Gospel, by Robert C Ferrell...  
I also make the pdf available for free at http://www.scriptural-truth.com

If you wish to support this channel, please consider making a donation:
  / apocryphile1970  

To Purchase the Super Gospel:
https://www.amazon.com/Super-Gospel-H...
or:
http://fifthestatepub.com/2011/the-su...
Website:
http://www.scriptural-truth.com

If you enjoy these videos, please consider making a donation:
patreon.com/Apocryphile1970
Purchase the Super Gospel:
amazon.com/Super-Gospel-Harmony-Ancient-Gospels/dp/1442119748

The Second Book of Enoch (usually abbreviated 2 Enoch, and otherwise variously known as Slavonic Enoch or The Secrets of Enoch) is a pseudepigraphic (a text whose claimed authorship is unfounded) of the Old Testament. It is usually considered to be part of the Apocalyptic literature. Late 1st century CE is the dating often preferred. The text has been preserved in full only in Slavonic, but in 2009 it was announced that Coptic fragments of the book had been identified. Greek is indicated as the language behind the Slavonic version. It is not regarded as scripture by Jews or any Christian group. It was rediscovered and published at the end of 19th century.

Most scholars consider 2 Enoch to be composed by an unknown Jewish sectarian group, while some authors think it is a 1st-century Christian text. Very few scholars consider it a later Christian work. This article discusses 2 Enoch. It is distinct from the Book of Enoch, known as 1 Enoch. There is also an unrelated 3 Enoch. The numbering of these texts has been applied by scholars to distinguish the texts from one another.

Manuscript Tradition
2 Enoch has survived in more than twenty Slavonic manuscripts and fragments dated from 14th to 18th centuries CE. These Slavonic materials did not circulate independently but were included in collections that often rearranged, abbreviated, or expanded them. Typically, Jewish pseudepigraphical texts in Slavic milieux were transmitted as part of larger historiographical, moral, and liturgical codexes and compendiums where ideologically marginal and mainstream materials were mixed with each other.

2 Enoch exists in longer and shorter recensions. The first editors considered original the longer version, while since 1921 Schmidt and many authors challenged this theory considering more ancient the shorter recension. Vaillant in 1952 showed that the additional parts found only in the longer version use more recent Slavonic terms. Other scholars suggest that both of them preserve original material and the existence of three or even four recensions.

Two different ways to numbering verses and chapters are used for 2 Enoch: the more widely accepted is Popov's one in 73 chapters, while De Santos Otero proposed a division in 24 chapters.

The best family of manuscripts are copies of the compilation of rearranged materials from chs. 40–65 from a 14th-century judicial codex "The Just Balance" ("Merilo Pravednoe"). The main manuscripts of the longer version are R, J and P. The main manuscripts of the shorter version are U, B, V, N. See also references.

Most scholars believe that the Slavonic version was translated from one or more Greek lost versions, since the text attests to some traditions that make sense only in the Greek language, for example a tradition found in 2 Enoch 30 that derives Adam’s name from the Greek designations of the four corners of the earth. The Semitisms, such as the words Ophanim, Raqia Arabot, and others found in various parts of the text, point to the possibility of the Semitic original behind the Greek version.

In 2009, four fragments from chapters 36-42 in Coptic have been identified. They follow the short recension a.

A Public Domain Version of this work is available at:
http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudep...

All audio read by myself, Robert C Ferrell. All Rights Reserved.