Скачать или смотреть Why Does Sorting a Vector of Strings with a Generic Lambda Fail in C+ + ?

Explore the reason behind the failure of sorting a vector of strings using generic lambdas in C+ + , and discover a solid solution to ensure efficient sorting.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/76652581/ asked by the user 'SandeshK3112' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/16646642/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/76652687/ provided by the user 'Ted Lyngmo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7582247/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why sorting a vector of strings with generic lambda doesn't work?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Why Does Sorting a Vector of Strings with a Generic Lambda Fail in C+ + ?

Sorting can often seem simple, yet there are underlying complexities when we're working with different types of data in C+ + . A common question among developers is: Why does sorting a vector of strings with a generic lambda sometimes not work? This issue can be surprisingly confusing, especially if you're using features from the latest C+ + standards. In this post, we'll unpack the reason behind this unexpected behavior and provide a clear solution.

Understanding the Problem

Let's consider this snippet of code that is intended to sort a vector of strings in C+ + :

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What Happens Here?

Generic Lambda Limitations: The lambda uses auto, which means it will deduce the types of s1 and s2 at compile time. When you initialize the vector like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here, vec2 is correctly a std::vector<std::string>. However, if it's accidentally left as const char* types - the lambda won't compare the content of the strings but the pointers themselves.

Consequences: The result will show that the order remains unchanged because sorting is being done based on the pointer addresses, not the string values.

The Solution

To resolve this, we need to ensure that the comparisons in our lambda are done against the actual string content rather than the pointer addresses. Here are a couple of effective approaches you can take:

1. Explicit Type Declaration

When defining the lambda, explicitly specify the parameter types as const std::string&, like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By specifying types, we ensure that the comparison checks the actual string values instead of their memory addresses.

2. Using Standard Functions

Another approach is to utilize std::strcmp, which compares C-style strings based on their content. Here’s how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This method directly compares two strings fed into the comparison function, ensuring that you want to handle C-style strings accurately.

Conclusion

In summary, if you find that sorting a vector of strings using a generic lambda is yielding unexpected results, remember to check the types involved in your comparisons. Either specify the types directly or use a method like std::strcmp for C-style strings to achieve the desired sorting behavior.

By staying mindful of type deductions and using the right comparison techniques, you can effectively sort your strings in C+ + without any hiccups. Happy coding!