Скачать или смотреть How to Fix Data Persistence Issues with Nested Forms in Rails simple_form

Struggling to get nested fields to persist in your Rails `simple_form`? This guide breaks down a common issue related to nested attributes and provides a clear solution to ensure all your data is saved correctly.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73228683/ asked by the user 'Kandi Peter' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15832648/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73248968/ provided by the user 'max' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/544825/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Rails simple form submits but nested fields from data doesn't persist

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Data Persistence Issues in Rails Nested Forms

When developing a Ruby on Rails application, specifically with the simple_form gem, you may encounter challenges with data persistence in nested forms. This is commonly seen when you're working with a one-to-many relationship, such as a section with multiple quotes. In this post, we'll explore an issue related to submitting nested fields and how to ensure all your data is saved effectively.

The Problem

In a recent project, a developer faced an issue when trying to create a section_quote with multiple nested quotes. Despite the base data being saved upon submission, the nested quote information failed to persist. This can be a common hurdle, especially when you're not managing your forms correctly.

Code Overview

The relevant aspects of the implementation included:

Model Definitions: There are two core models in play: SectionQuote and Quote.

Nested Attributes: The SectionQuote model accepts nested attributes for Quote through accepts_nested_attributes_for.

Form Implementation: The form is built using simple_form, where the developer tried to instantiate a new Quote for each nested field.

Diagnosis: What Went Wrong?

The crux of the issue lies in the way the simple_fields_for helper was set up. The developer attempted to create a new instance of Quote directly in the form using this line of code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This approach has a couple of downsides:

Single Instance Creation: You are passing a single instance of the Quote class to the simple_fields_for. This means that if the form encounters validation errors, any user input is lost when the form is re-rendered.

Anti-Pattern: Instantiating models within views violates best practices. The controller should prepare the data for views, not the other way around.

The Solution: Seeding Associations Correctly

To resolve the persistence issue, we need to seed the quotes association correctly in the controller, so that the view can dynamically handle user input correctly. Here’s how you can implement the solution:

Step 1: Modify the Controller

In your SectionsController, modify the new action to prepare the nested Quote instances before rendering the form.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Update Your View

Now, simplify your simple_fields_for usage in the view. Instead of creating a new instance of Quote, you'll leverage the already built -section object that contains nested Quote instances.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This setup will ensure that all user inputs are maintained through form submissions, allowing the data to persist as expected.

Conclusion

By tweaking your controller and the way you're handling your nested forms in a Rails application using simple_form, you can effectively ensure data persistence. Remember, the focus should always be on preparing your data in the controller and letting your view simply present it.
This way, you avoid losing user input on form re-renders and keep your application logic clean and maintainable.

If you find yourself struggling with Rails nested forms again, remember this approach: always prepare your associations in the controller, and keep your views focused on rendering data rather than instantiating models. Happy coding!