ARTICLE 31-B AND NINTH SCHEDULE OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EXPLAINED BY JUSTICE NARIMAN

Описание к видео ARTICLE 31-B AND NINTH SCHEDULE OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EXPLAINED BY JUSTICE NARIMAN

ARTICLE 31-B AND NINTH SCHEDULE OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, EXPLAINED BY JUSTICE ROHINTON NARIMAN IN EPISODE 76
Rohinton Fali Nariman (born 13 August 1956) is a Judge of Supreme Court of India. Before being elevated as a judge, he practised as a senior counsel at the Supreme Court. He was appointed the Solicitor General of India on 23 July 2011.He also served as a member of the Bar Council of India.[4] He was designated as a Senior Counsel by Justice Venkatachaliah (the then Chief Justice of India) in 1993 at the early age of 37.
Early life and education
Nariman is the son of Fali Sam Nariman, a distinguished Indian jurist. He received his early education in Mumbai, at the Cathedral and John Connon School. He completed his undergraduate B.Com. degree from Shri Ram College of Commerce. He completed his LL.B from Campus Law Centre of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, where he ranked 2nd in the batch. He then went to Harvard Law School for his LL.M. degree in 1980–81 where he was taught by stalwarts like Professor Laurence Tribe and Professor Unger.

Legal career
Nariman joined the Bar as an advocate in 1979.
Times of India has placed him among top ten lawyers of his time.
After his year at Harvard, he practised Maritime Law in New York at Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens for a year. He has been designated as a Senior Advocate at Supreme Court of India from 15 December 1993 at the young age of 37.
While appointing him Chief Justice Venkatachalaiah amended the rules as Nariman was of 37 years and the minimum age for being made a senior in the Supreme Court was 45.

He has been practising law for the last 30 years and has more than 500 reported Supreme Court Judgments to his credit. He is an expert in Comparative Constitutional Law and Civil Law. He has argued numerous cases, including the constitutional bench judgments of P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra[13] and State of Punjab v. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке