Скачать или смотреть How to Overcome Double Mutable References Error in Rust with Nested Loops

Discover a simple approach to avoid mutable reference errors in Rust while using double for loops to manipulate struct properties.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66360306/ asked by the user 'Skillkiller' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13231742/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66360785/ provided by the user 'Hadus' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6304086/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Double for loop mutable references

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the Double Mutable References Error in Rust

When working with Rust, one of the key features of the language is its ownership system. While it provides memory safety and concurrency guarantees, it can sometimes introduce challenges, particularly when attempting to work with mutable references. In this guide, we will explore a common scenario that can lead to errors when using double for loops, specifically the double mutable references issue.

The Problem: Double Mutable References

Consider a situation where you want to compare each element of a vector with every other element. If any two elements are found to have the same property (in this case, the value of a), you need to modify one of these elements. Here's a simplified version of the code that attempts to achieve this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, if you run this code, you will encounter the following error from the Rust compiler:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This is due to attempting to create two mutable references to the same vector, which the borrow checker does not allow.

The Solution: Avoiding Multiple Mutable Borrows

The first thing to realize is that you don't need two mutable references in the first place! Instead, you can focus on using a single mutable reference when you need to modify a vector element.

Revised Code Structure

Here’s a cleaner and more efficient way to write the loop using only immutable borrows for the comparison and a single mutable borrow for modification. The solution can be broken down into these steps:

Use Immutable References for Comparison: Create immutable references for the elements being compared.

Perform Conditional Mutation: Execute the mutation using a mutable reference only when necessary.

Here’s how the revised code looks:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Takeaways

No Need for Multiple Mutable Borrows: In this context, only one mutable reference is necessary. The other values can be compared using immutable references.

Understanding Borrowing Rules: Rust enforces strict borrowing rules to ensure safety. No two mutable references to the same item can coexist.

Efficient Code: By using this pattern, you can prevent errors and write more efficient and idiomatic Rust code.



In conclusion, while navigating Rust's borrowing system can be tricky, understanding the requirements of mutable and immutable references can help you write clearer and more effective code. If you need to compare and modify elements within a loop, remember to limit your mutable references to ensure compatibility with Rust's safety guarantees.