Israel vs Italy – 2022 European Championships

I honestly didn't expected this video to be so long, but hey, new group code so get ready!
English subtitles are available

Outside of visual field for CR and double throw: after clarification from Worlds judges instruction, some criteria counted in this video review are not valid [10/05/2023 I stopped updating since September 2022 be careful, however the majority of things said in this video are still true]
—it is now not enough to throw backwards or throw 2 apparatus in opposite direction (one in front, one behind) to get ''outside of visual field'': the part of the body throwing one apparatus must be in a position defined as ''outside of visual field''
—collaborations affected by this: Israel 1:41 // 2:54 (0.2) — Italy 7:39 (note: this collaboration has probably also participation problems) // 9:32 10:05 10:20 (0.4)
RESULTS: 49 for both Israel and Italy

Disclaimer:
You probably all know the drill by now but I prefer to always be clear about it: this is a review done by videos from TDP broadcast. 1. Even if I can be more accurate in some ways because of slow-motion, I still can't be fully objective in everything I see (camera angles, video quality, me being a human being...etc). 2. Judges's scores are judges's scores (done in real time). Mine are not trying to challenge them; this video is merely done for explaning the new code.

Some observations (yes, text, text, text , again, again, again):
1.Even though my scores are very different from the judges, the general vibes kinda stay the same: a very thin gap (0.5 point gap in this kind of review isn't what I consider ''big'', it's like a tie; I know some of you will probably point out some of my mistakes and the ranking will go one way or another). The problem is that there is also a difference in medal, gold or silver. The code made the judges's job much much easier compare to last code but the task is still a bit surhuman.
2.Does execution score make much sense in video review? Because getting less than 1/10 is sure not what I expect for a rather clean routine. This is probably the limit of video review!
3.The new code require collaborations and a criteria in Exchange to have 8 meters distance. I gave several collaborations and Exchange the benefit of the doubt for both groups because camera angles can really be lying sometimes (there is 0.4 point of doubt for Italy and 3.1 for Israel; there is also 1.1 point of doubt for some collaborations for Italy due to dubious participation)
4.When there is no box for the difficulty, the reason is mostly because of problem in composition (lack of participation from a gymnast or overlapping).
5.The code change now and then with various updates: there might be change in the months to come

Timestamps
00:06 Israel 5 hoops
02:51 Israel 3+2
05:35 Italy 5 hoops
08:19 Italy 3+2
11:03 Explanations part 1: simple stuff (body difficulties, risk, wave and apparatus fundamental element)
16:57 Explanations part 2: Exchange
21:40 Explanations part 3: Collaborations
31:02 Explanations part 4: Artistry

TW: This video includes a movie clip with a gunshot and someone ''dying''. Skip 31:01 to 31:16 to avoid.

Musics and videos used:
Eine Kleine Nachtmusik - Mozart
Tock Time Warp Tick - South London HiFi
Party Like Its 1920 (Instrumental) - The Swinghoppers & Wolfgang Lohr
Lone Digger (Instrumental) - Caravan Palace
Waltz of the Flowers - Tchaikovsky
Drifting at 432 Hz - Unicorn Heads
Sailor Moon OST - Moon Prism Power Make Up!
Pink Flamingos (1972)