Скачать или смотреть Understanding and Preventing Unexpected Mutation of Object Arrays in JavaScript

Learn how to avoid unexpected mutations in JavaScript object arrays by understanding reference vs. copy. This guide provides solutions with clear explanations and code examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64388667/ asked by the user 'uncool' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3841809/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64388881/ provided by the user 'gvmani' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1825844/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Unexpected mutation of object array

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding and Preventing Unexpected Mutation of Object Arrays in JavaScript

When working with JavaScript, one common issue developers face is the unexpected mutation of object arrays. This can lead to confusing bugs and unintended behavior in your applications. In this guide, we will explore a real-world scenario that illustrates this problem and how to effectively prevent object mutations from causing headaches in your code.

The Problem: Unexpected Mutation

Imagine you are building a simple object-based API in JavaScript. You have a function, operator.first_load_chart, that modifies data stored in operator.data. However, after running this function, you notice that the original operator.data['date'] has changed unexpectedly from Unix timestamps to Date objects.

Here's a snippet of the relevant code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When you run console.log(operator.data['date']) after executing operator.first_load_chart, you see that it has mutated. The reason behind this behavior is that ref_data is a direct reference to operator.data, not a separate copy. Hence, any modification to ref_data directly affects operator.data.

The Solution: Making a Copy

To prevent this unexpected mutation, you need to create a copy of the data before modifying it. One way to achieve this is by using Object.assign to create a shallow copy of the data object. Here's how you can modify the code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Important Note on Shallow vs. Deep Copy

While Object.assign helps you create a shallow copy, it is essential to remember that this approach does not handle nested objects. If your data structure is more complex and contains nested objects, those inner objects will still be references to the original data. To manage this, you would need to perform a deep copy, which can be achieved by utilizing libraries such as Lodash or by writing a custom deep copy function.

Summary

When developing in JavaScript and working with objects and arrays, it's crucial to understand how references work. Here’s a quick recap of what we covered:

Problem: Direct referencing of objects can lead to unexpected mutations.

Solution: Create copies of data before modification using methods like Object.assign.

Caution: Be aware of shallow copy limitations. For nested objects, consider deep copy methods.

By following these principles, you can avoid unexpected object mutations and ensure your application behaves as intended. Happy coding!