Learn how to troubleshoot and fix issues in your bubble sort implementation for sorting arrays efficiently!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73781612/ asked by the user 'Ashutosh Yadav' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19976747/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73781650/ provided by the user 'Alexander Richter' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9056053/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: I've tried implementing bubble sort on my own, the code breaks down when I provide random unsorted input, when I give sorted or reverse numbers
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Fixing the Bubble Sort Algorithm: Solutions for Common Issues
Implementing a sorting algorithm like bubble sort can be challenging, especially for those just starting in programming. If you've found your code breaking when providing random unsorted input, you're not alone! This guide will address a common mistake many programmers make while working on bubble sort and guide you through fixing it effectively.
Understanding the Problem
You might have written your own version of the bubble sort algorithm, only to be met with unexpected behavior. Here's the issue: when the input is unsorted, the code breaks, and while it may function with sorted or reverse-sorted numbers, it doesn't give consistent results. The primary problem lies in how the array is being accessed during the swapping process. Let's break it down.
Example of the Problematic Code
Here's a snippet from your implementation:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Issues Identified
Out-of-Bounds Access:
As highlighted, when you access a[i+ j], you might go beyond the size of the array, which leads to undefined behavior.
If i is close to N, adding j can exceed the valid range of indices for the array.
Incorrect Loop Condition:
The inner loop condition is simply j < N, which doesn't take into account the actual position of i.
How to Fix the Bubble Sort Implementation
To fix the issues in your bubble sort implementation, let’s go through a couple of important changes step-by-step.
1. Adjusting the Inner Loop Condition
Modify the condition in your inner loop to properly account for the i index to ensure you don’t access out-of-bounds memory:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This means that instead of taking j as a standalone counter, it now adjusts based on the current value of i, keeping it safe from accessing beyond the array limits.
2. Using Appropriate Data Types
While this won't directly fix the core functionality, as a best practice, consider using size_t instead of int for loop counters, particularly when dealing with sizes or indices of arrays. This makes your code safer and more expressive about how you handle sizes.
Revised Bubble Sort Implementation
Combining the insights above, here’s an improved version of your bubble sort:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Conclusion
By these simple adjustments, you can prevent your bubble sort algorithm from breaking when provided with random unsorted input. Remember, understanding the underlying logic and indexing is crucial in programming. Keep practicing, and you’ll master sorting algorithms in no time!
Happy coding!
Информация по комментариям в разработке