Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Differences Between ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor in Python

Explore common issues with Python's `ThreadPoolExecutor` and `ProcessPoolExecutor`, including handling exceptions and how to improve process stability in your asynchronous code.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65009138/ asked by the user 'Rufat' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9913319/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65009526/ provided by the user 'Szabolcs' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6337523/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: ThreadPoolExecutor works, but ProcessPoolExecutor gives exception

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Differences Between ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor in Python

Python's concurrent.futures module allows developers to easily manage future tasks using two powerful classes: ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor. Both of these classes can boost the performance of your code, but they serve different purposes and behave differently in concurrent scenarios. In this guide, we’ll address a common problem: why does ThreadPoolExecutor handle exceptions better than ProcessPoolExecutor, and how can we tackle issues related to process termination?

The Problem: Encountering Exceptions with ProcessPoolExecutor

Many developers use concurrent programming to speed up their applications, particularly when dealing with I/O-bound tasks like network requests. The example here involves fetching URLs concurrently. The code works seamlessly using ThreadPoolExecutor, but crashes with ProcessPoolExecutor due to exceptions being thrown in worker processes.

Example Code

Let’s consider these two snippets, where the first one employs ThreadPoolExecutor, and the second one replaces it with ProcessPoolExecutor.

Using ThreadPoolExecutor

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using ProcessPoolExecutor

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the second example, if even one worker process encounters an error, it results in the abrupt termination of all other processes. This issue is not present in the thread version, where exceptions from one thread do not affect the others.

Why Does This Occur?

Understanding the Behavior of Process Pools

In Python versions up to 3.6.x, an unhandled exception in any worker of the ProcessPoolExecutor leads to all other processes being terminated along with an error message stating that the process was abruptly terminated. The key differences between how threads and processes are handled account for this behavior:

Threading uses shared memory and generally results in a lighter overhead, allowing for shared exceptions without affecting all threads.

Multiprocessing involves inter-process communication and separate memory spaces, so an error in one process can lead to the system deeming it necessary to terminate all active processes to maintain stability.

Solution: Improving Stability by Catching Exceptions

The solution lies in wrapping the code that could potentially throw exceptions. By implementing error handling within the worker function, you can isolate failures and prevent cascading terminations:

Revised Code Implementation

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach:

Isolated Error Handling: Individual processes will log the error without affecting others.

Improved Stability: You can avoid sudden crashes of the entire pool of processes even if one fails.

Final Thoughts

Moving forward, upgrading to a newer Python version (like 3.8.x or later) can naturally improve the handling of exceptions in process pools, as certain bugs related to process terminations have been resolved. For most use cases, particularly I/O-bound tasks, preferential treatment towards ThreadPoolExecutor may yield better results if exception handling is a concern.

In conclusion, understanding the differences between ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor is crucial for making informed decisions in concurrent programming. Leveraging proper error handling strategies ensures that your applications remain robust and resilient to errors during execution.

With these insights, we encourage you to explore your multiprocessing capabilities while mindfully handling exceptions!