Скачать или смотреть Resolving BigQuery UDF Conditional Evaluation Issues with Effective Type Handling

Discover how to resolve conditional evaluation issues in Google BigQuery UDFs by correctly handling data types and utilizing JavaScript efficiently.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63103162/ asked by the user 'jtaylor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3543214/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63104717/ provided by the user 'Mikhail Berlyant' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5221944/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Conditional evaluation bigquery UDF

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Conditional Evaluation in BigQuery UDFs

When working with Google BigQuery's User-Defined Functions (UDFs), many users face challenges while evaluating conditions, especially when passing parameters that determine the range of values. If you've ever dealt with unexpected outcomes while performing conditional checks within a UDF, you're not alone. In this guide, we’ll explore a common problem encountered in BigQuery UDFs and present a clear solution to ensure your UDFs operate as intended.

The Problem

Consider this scenario: you are trying to check if a specific integer input falls within a certain range defined by two other parameters. Let's summarize the steps that lead to unexpected results in your UDF:

You pass three parameters: INPUT, P5, and P10.

You check if INPUT is greater than P5 and less than or equal to P10.

An example with INPUT = 117, P5 = 1, and P10 = 2 returns TRUE, which is incorrect since 117 isn't within that range.

What’s causing this incorrect evaluation? Let's delve deeper.

The Reason Behind the Odd Outcome

The root of the issue lies in the data type of the parameters being used in the UDF:

INT64 type: While it is a common data type for integers in BigQuery, it is not recognized and is unsupported as input for JavaScript UDFs.

String interpretation: Because of this limitation, the input values are treated as strings instead of numbers, leading to bizarre logic errors in evaluations.

Consider the following example code snippet originally used:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this code, the conditional check is failing due to improper type signage, causing erroneous results.

The Solution: Use FLOAT64 Instead of INT64

To resolve this discrepancy, you should use the FLOAT64 type for your parameters. FLOAT64 can accurately represent integer values as numbers, and it is compatible with JavaScript within BigQuery. Here's how the corrected UDF should look:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Summary

Key Takeaways:

Always ensure data types are compatible with the programming language used in UDFs. For JavaScript UDFs in BigQuery, prefer using FLOAT64 for numeric comparisons.

Misinterpretation of data types can lead to incorrect logical evaluations which may confuse the state of your data workflow.

By applying the fix of switching to FLOAT64, you can avoid the common pitfalls associated with type mismatch, leading to accurate condition evaluations. Now, you can apply this understanding to develop effective UDFs that work seamlessly with your data!

If you found this guide helpful or have any questions, feel free to leave a comment below!