Texas’s new era of electricity demand is forcing policymakers to walk an unprecedented tightrope.
The state has to keep the lights on – and it has to make sure that Texans can afford to do so..
Massive load growth from data centers, population, and electrification is teeing up existential questions for the ERCOT grid. How do we build what we need without overbuilding? And how do we avoid burdening households with costs that businesses and large users should be paying?
Those questions framed our latest Energy Capital roundtable with Matt Boms and Dr. Joshua Rhodes.
Why bills are rising faster than people expect
Utilities across the country are planning massive infrastructure investments over the next several years, and Texas is leading the way. Between new generation, transmission, and distribution upgrades, the price tag for this growth is substantial.
Texas has covered recent load growth primarily with a mix of solar, wind and batteries. Some state leaders have prioritized new gas plants as well, though capital costs for these facilities has more than doubled in some cases, even as wait lists for turbines have grown (https://www.reuters.com/markets/commo...) .
At the same time, transmission and distribution companies are filing rate cases tied to resiliency, reliability, and growth. Those investments often show up in rates years before customers see any economic benefit from load growth.
What’s driving costs matters more than ever
As large new loads, especially data centers, request connection to the grid, the question of who pays becomes unavoidable.
The basic principle is simple: if infrastructure is built for a specific customer, that customer should bear the cost. If infrastructure provides broad system value, then costs should be shared. Problems arise when all customers pay for expensive upgrades to cover loads that may be temporary or never fully materialize – especially with transformers, substations, and core hardware now costing multiples more than they did just a few years ago.
Without guardrails, Texas risks building expensive infrastructure that everyone pays for, even if demand disappears for the energy that infrastructure is meant to support.
Underused tools
There are ways to blunt this load-growth pressure.
Distributed energy resources (i.e. community power or local power), demand response, and energy waste reduction can reduce peak demand and delay or avoid costly grid upgrades. In many cases, these solutions are faster and cheaper than traditional investments in poles and wires.
Analyses show that even modest levels of community power can save ratepayers meaningful amounts of money by deferring transmission and distribution spending while also delivering wholesale market value.
One way or another, decisions made in upcoming utility rate cases will lock in costs for decades.
Grid growth is real. Infrastructure costs are rising. Ignoring either won’t protect customers. The state must align costs with the parties driving them, wringing out value from lower-cost flexibility strategies before committing to the most expensive build-outs.
If Texas effectively walks the line between affordability and reliability, this period of load growth can strengthen the grid without punishing Texans who rely on it.
Timestamps
00:06 – Rising Costs, Rising Stakes
01:17 – Load Growth and System Pressure
03:16 – Gas Dependence and Fuel Risk
06:21 – New Generation Costs and Competition
07:05 – Oncor Rate Case, $830M Request
08:27 – Who Pays, ERCOT vs Other States
12:08 – Driveway vs Highway Cost Test
15:33 – Capital Bias and Regulatory Incentives
18:49 – Avoiding Rate Shock, Role of DERs
24:07 – Higher Prices, Solar Payback Effect
34:12 – Missing Price Signals in Distribution
37:05 – Final Takeaways and Wrap
Resources
Hosts Platforms
Texas Energy & Power - LinkedIn ( / the-energy-capital-podcast ) , Twitter (X) (https://x.com/txenergyandpowr) , and Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/txenergyandp...)
Micalah Spenrath - LinkedIn ( / micalah-spenrath )
Matt Boms - LinkedIn ( / mattboms )
Texas Advanced Energy Business Alliance (TAEBA) (https://texasadvancedenergy.org/?utm_...) - LinkedIn ( / advanced-energy-united )
Joshua Rhodes - LinkedIn ( / joshua-d-rhodes-phd-2502b82b )
IdeaSmiths (https://www.ideasmiths.net/)
Webber Energy Group, UT Austin (https://webberenergygroup.com/?utm_so...)
Company & Industry News
Electricity rate hikes slash commercial solar payback periods by 33%, says Wood Mackenzie (pv magazine USA) (https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2026/01/1....
Информация по комментариям в разработке