Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Distinction Between internal and public Members in Kotlin's Internal Classes

Discover the differences between `internal` and `public` members in Kotlin classes, and learn how access modifiers affect member visibility and usability within modules.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/74494958/ asked by the user 'Zeljko Brckovic' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6788321/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/74497184/ provided by the user 'sorenoid' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4195513/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: In Kotlin language what is the difference between an internal member and a public member within an internal class?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Distinction Between internal and public Members in Kotlin's Internal Classes

Kotlin has a unique approach to access modifiers that can sometimes confuse developers, particularly when it comes to internal and public members within internal classes. If you've ever wondered how these modifiers interact within an internal context and what implications they carry, you're not alone. In this post, we’ll break down the differences between internal and public members in an internal class, using a simple example for clarity.

What Does internal Mean in Kotlin?

In Kotlin, the internal visibility modifier means that the member (class, property, or function) is accessible only within the same module. A module could be a set of Kotlin files compiled together, such as an IntelliJ IDEA module, an Android project, or a Maven project. Here’s a brief overview of the visibility modifiers available in Kotlin:

public: Visible everywhere (default visibility).

private: Visible only within the class or file where it is declared.

protected: Visible within the class and its subclasses.

internal: Visible within the same module.

Example Breakdown

Let's examine the following Kotlin class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, we have the Point class marked as internal. This means that the entire class is only accessible within the same module. But what about its members?

Members of the Class: internal vs public

internal val x: This property is also marked as internal, so it can only be accessed within the same module as the Point class.

public val y: Despite being declared as public, this property is accessible only within the same module because the enclosing class is internal.

So, What’s the Big Difference?

At a glance, it might seem like there’s no practical difference between the two properties since both are effectively limited by the internal access of the enclosing class. However, the distinction lies in the behavior and context:

Getter Method:

The public val y implies that it can be accessed publicly outside of the class context if the class were to be exposed. In Java, this would equate to having a public getter method available to anyone who can access the class.

In a purely Kotlin environment, since the Point class is marked internal, the public getter becomes superfluous, as it would not allow access beyond the module.

Code Clarity:

Using public for y can serve as documentation for developers who read your code. They understand that y is designed to be accessed more broadly if the context of the class changes in the future.

Conclusion: Is There a Practical Difference?

While you might find yourself in a situation where both internal and public members behave similarly due to the class's internal visibility, knowing the distinction is crucial. It helps maintain clear coding standards and prepares your code for potential modifications in the future. The public modifier may not provide immediate utility in an internal class, but it does communicate intent.

In summary, understanding the implications of access modifiers in Kotlin not only enhances code clarity but also aids in effective software design. Always consider how your class visibility interacts with its members to ensure you are making the best decisions for your codebase.

This nuanced understanding helps you become a better Kotlin developer and fosters cleaner, more maintainable code. Happy coding!