Скачать или смотреть How to Efficiently Search for a Node in an Ordered Linked List Using C+ +

Learn how to fix segmentation faults when searching for nodes in an ordered linked list with this simple, step-by-step guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63481584/ asked by the user 'ICS' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12087492/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63481669/ provided by the user 'paxdiablo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14860/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: C+ + search for a node in an ordered linked list

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Efficiently Searching for a Node in an Ordered Linked List Using C+ +

If you're working with an ordered linked list in C+ + , you might encounter a common problem: retrieving a specific node based on its ID. This task can become a hassle, especially when faced with errors like Core Dump (Segmentation fault). Fear not! In this post, I will guide you through the process of searching for a node in an ordered linked list and show you how to avoid those pesky errors.

Understanding Your Structure

First, let's clarify the structure of your linked list. You have a simple node structure defined as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this structure, you can traverse your linked list to find nodes, but there's an important caveat: if you are not careful with your conditions and checks, you'll encounter segmentation faults.

The Problem at Hand

You're trying to search for a node with a specific ID, but your existing search function has a flaw. It returns NULL if the node isn't found, but in the next step, you attempt to dereference this NULL return value. This results in a segmentation fault because you're trying to access memory that your program isn't allowed to.

Here’s the flawed portion of your code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

If resp is NULL, this check will cause your program to crash. So how do we fix this issue effectively?

The Solution

We'll need to make a few adjustments to your search and showNode functions to handle this case properly and improve the overall clarity of your code. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of the improvements:

Revised Search Function

We need to ensure that our search function correctly handles its return value. Here's the updated version of the function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes

Use of nullptr: It's more modern and preferred over NULL when dealing with pointer values.

Renaming Parameters: The function parameter aux is renamed to curr for better readability.

Short-Circuiting the Search: As soon as we reach a node with an ID greater than the target (c), we stop searching, as an ordered list guarantees no matching ID will follow.

Revised ShowNode Function

Now let's fix the showNode function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Summary of Changes

By implementing the above changes, we ensure that your code is robust and avoids the possibility of dereferencing a nullptr. Here are some essential points from our revisions:

Always check the return value of your search function before trying to access its contents.

Use modern C+ + practices, such as using nullptr.

Simplify the code by reducing conditional checks and improving clarity.

Conclusion

Searching for a node in an ordered linked list in C+ + doesn't have to be complicated or prone to errors. By following the steps outlined above, you can efficiently find nodes without encountering segmentation faults. Remember to always check your pointers and be cautious of the return values from your functions! Happy coding!