Admissibility of previous consistent statements as evidence in South African courts Dr Philani L N

Описание к видео Admissibility of previous consistent statements as evidence in South African courts Dr Philani L N

The admission of previous consistent statements as evidence is premised upon restrictive qualifications. As a general rule, previous consistent statements are inadmissible, much as they represent an attempt by a witness to self-corroborate by repeating the same statement ad nauseam. Their probative value is often very limited such that their competence to sway the weight of evidence is disapppointingly weak.

Комментарии

Информация по комментариям в разработке

Похожие видео