Minerva Mills Vs. Union of India | Landmark case laws

𝗗𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗲?

𝗦𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? 𝗗𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝘂𝘀?

𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗷𝗼𝗯? 𝗗𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰𝘀, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗷𝗼𝗯 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗲?

𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳 for a 3-day Bootcamp On 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺𝘀: https://bit.ly/369FWUh

𝟭𝟬-𝟭𝟮 𝗝𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭, 𝟲-𝟵 𝗽𝗺 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲.
__________________________________________________________________

To upskill yourself and stay ahead in your career, check out top courses 👇:
👉Lord of the courses (judiciary test prep)
: https://bit.ly/300WprB
__________________________________________________________________
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Hon’ble Justices [Chandrachud, Y.V. ((Cj), Bhagwati, P.N., Gupta, A.C., Untwalia, N.L., Kailasam, P.S.]
Judgment Date: 31.07.1980
Case Number : Writ Petition (Civil) 356 of 1977

Issues:
Whether the 42nd Constitutional (Amendment) Act, 1976 is constitutionally valid?
Provisions:
Article 14 of the Constitution of India
Article 19 of the Constitution of India
Article 21 of the Constitution of India
Article 31 of the Constitution of India
Article 368 of the Constitution of India
Nationalization Act, 1974

Interested in learning more? Drop by our website:
🌐https://lawsikho.com/
_________________________________________________________________

To watch our webinars every day, please subscribe to our YouTube Channel 😍👇:
   / lawsikho  
_________________________________________________________________

Find us on 🔍:

👉 Facebook:   / lawsikho  

👉 LinkedIn:   / laws.  .

👉 Instagram:   / lawsikho  

👉 Twitter:   / lawsikho  

👉 Telegram https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpu...

#LawSikho #LegalLearning #LegalCareers #LawStudents #Lawyers #BALLB #LLM #LLB