Скачать или смотреть Understanding why gameObject.GetComponent T != null is always true in Unity

Discover the reason behind the unexpected behavior of `GetComponent T ()` in Unity and how to fix it effectively!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72337785/ asked by the user 'rootpanthera' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1769269/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72350567/ provided by the user 'user8343229' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8343229/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: gameObject.GetComponent T != null is always true. How?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding why gameObject.GetComponent<T> != null is always true in Unity

When working with Unity, developers often encounter instances where the behavior of GetComponent<T>() can be puzzling, especially when checking if a GameObject possesses a certain component. In today’s guide, we'll explore a canonical issue: why does the condition gameObject.GetComponent<T>() != null always evaluate to true, even when it shouldn’t?

The Scenario

Imagine you are developing a game in Unity, and you have a list of three GameObjects. Out of these, only one contains a Light component. While iterating over this list, you expect to check for the presence of the Light component on each GameObject, using the following code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, irrespective of the actual presence of the Light component on the GameObjects, your if condition consistently returns true. This is not the expected behavior and can be quite frustrating.

Analyzing the Problem

The fundamental issue lies within how generic types are managed in C# . Here's a breakdown of the problem:

Generic Type T: In your code, T is intended to be the Light component. However, because T is not constrained to be derived from a specific type, it may result in Unity evaluating the expression incorrectly.

Component Retrieval: Unity allows you to call GetComponent<T>() without restrictions on T. This means that, when you iterate through the GameObjects, GetComponent<T>() could technically return a non-null component even if it’s not the one you expect, simply due to how the generic system operates.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, you can limit T to be a type of Component. This constraint ensures that the GetComponent<T>() function behaves as intended and only returns components correctly verified against the specified type.

Here’s how you can alter your function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes:

Generic Type Constraint: We added where T : Component to the function signature, enforcing that T must always be a type derived from the Component class. This helps tailor the behavior of GetComponent<T>() to your needs.

What’s Next?

Now that you’ve included the constraint, you can test the function effectively. For instance, calling FindInScene<Light>() inside your MonoBehaviour class, like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With this change, your debug log should print 1 if only one object indeed contains a Light component.

Conclusion

This simple adjustment clarifies the behavior of GetComponent<T>() and ensures that your code behaves logically and predictably in Unity. Understanding generics and type constraints is critical for effective coding, especially in a game engine like Unity, where components play a vital role in functionality.

By applying these modifications, you should now have a robust method that works as intended while leveraging the power of generics to keep your code clean and reusable.

Enjoy coding in Unity!