Скачать или смотреть Relapse and Redemption: Defendant’s $14,000 Restitution Fight Before Judge Mogen

#CourtroomDrama #ProbationHearing #WisconsinCourt #JusticeInAction #rehabilitationjourney

In this Wisconsin courtroom hearing, the judge presides over the probation review for Lance Shaw, who faces two separate cases (13CF06 and 13CF168) with significant restitution balances totaling over $23,000. Present are DOC Agent Gretchen Anabis, defense attorney Renee Langrath, and the defendant himself.

Agent Anabis reports that Lance has been showing progress after a recent relapse, attending AA meetings at Crossroads Church, and reconnecting with his two sponsors. He’s also pursuing employment — interviewing at Webster Lumberyard and receiving a construction job offer with RPS Construction at $25/hour, as well as a private opportunity helping a local resident build a deck and move belongings from Illinois.

Attorney Langrath requests clarification on a lump-sum restitution payment option to potentially convert the remainder into a civil judgment, noting that DOC supports such an arrangement if Lance can pay a substantial portion upfront. However, due to the construction road ban limiting work until mid-May, consistent income has been a challenge.

The judge commends Lance’s progress and job efforts but stresses the importance of consistent monthly restitution payments, starting as soon as he receives his first paycheck. A follow-up probation review hearing is scheduled for July 28th at 2:00 PM, with the condition that DOC notify the court earlier if payments lapse. The judge reminds all parties that restitution cannot be legally waived, though victims may choose to forgive portions voluntarily.

This hearing underscores a balance between accountability and rehabilitation, recognizing Lance’s ongoing recovery efforts while reaffirming the legal obligations that remain binding.

Subscribe My Channel[‪@DobermansCourt‬ ]

Disclaimer:
This summary is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice or reflect any official court ruling beyond the public record.