Скачать или смотреть Resolving web3js Send and Call Issues with Smart Contracts: A Guide to Transaction Success

Struggling with `web3js`'s `send()` or `call()` methods? Discover a practical solution that can help you successfully interact with your smart contracts.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72485587/ asked by the user 'Dara' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10402742/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72543422/ provided by the user 'Dara' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10402742/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: can not use web3js send() or call() function

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving web3js Send and Call Issues with Smart Contracts: A Guide to Transaction Success

When developing smart contracts, especially using Solidity and the web3js library, developers can sometimes encounter frustrating obstacles with transaction methods like send() and call(). This guide aims to tackle a common issue faced by developers when trying to add owners to a smart contract using a specific function called addOwner.

The Problem

The addOwner function in your smart contract requires three parameters: an array of owner names (of type string), an array of owner addresses (of type address) and an integer representing the number of confirmations required from the owners. The frustration arises when using the send() or call() methods of web3js, both of which can lead to errors or unexpected outcomes.

For instance, using:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Results in an error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conversely, using the call() method yields a disappointing Result {} response.

Why It's Happening

The issues you're facing can be attributed to multiple factors:

Gas Limit: Smart contract methods often require a specific amount of gas to execute successfully. If the gas limit is too low, the transaction will fail.

State Requirements: The function may have conditions (like onlyOwner) that prevent it from executing if certain criteria are not met.

Unique Owner Requirement: The contract checks if the owner address is already in use. If it is, the function won't proceed.

The Solution

After identifying the potential causes of transaction failure, the solution is straightforward: Increase the gas limit when invoking the function. Here's how you can do it:

Step 1: Specify a Gas Limit

Modify your initial transaction command to include a sufficient gas limit:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By explicitly adding the gas option, you ensure the transaction has enough resources to complete the execution.

Conclusion

In summary, when you encounter errors with web3js's send() or call() methods, especially regarding smart contract interactions, don't overlook the importance of gas limits. Adjusting the gas as demonstrated can effectively solve your issues, allowing you to seamlessly add owners or execute other smart contract functions.

By understanding the underlying reasons for transaction failures and knowing how to adjust your calls accordingly, you can enhance your experience when working with smart contracts and web3js.

Happy coding!