What Chess Engines Can’t Fully Capture in Human Play

🔵 My Chessable Courses: https://chessable.com/drcan
♟️ Find me on Chess.com: canka19
♟️ Find me on Lichess: cantosh
🏆 2022 Chessable Community Author of the Year! https://www.chessable.com/blog/announ...
🏆 2023 Chessable Best Tactics Course of the Year! https://www.chessable.com/fundamental...

Connect on   / kabadayichess  

Go Chessable Pro using this link to support the channel: https://chessable.com/drcanpro

In this video, we delve into a fascinating endgame position where the choices for White are deceptively complex. While chess engines spit out a flat 0.0000 evaluation for multiple moves, they don't account for the human struggle to find these optimal lines under pressure.

We talk about how chess engines can't distinguish between easier and harder paths to a draw for a human in a practical game. We also mention the metacognitive aspects of decision-making in endgames and key patterns and strategies to improve your pawn endgame skills.

Would you play g6 or gxh6 in a practical game? Did you understand from the initial position that White was fighting for a draw? Please share your thoughts in the comments.