Скачать или смотреть Why is PostgreSQL Full Text Search Slower Than SQLite FTS? Solutions Revealed!

Dive into identifying why PostgreSQL's full text search can be slower than SQLite's and discover actionable solutions to enhance performance with connection pooling.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66244830/ asked by the user 'sveri' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1103863/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66249489/ provided by the user 'sveri' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1103863/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Postgresql full text search 8 times slower than sqlite fts search

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Performance Gap: PostgreSQL vs. SQLite Full Text Search

When it comes to database management, speed is often a critical factor. If you find that PostgreSQL’s full text search (FTS) performance is significantly lagging behind SQLite FTS—about eight times slower in this case—it can be frustrating. This article will break down the reasons behind this performance discrepancy and offer solutions to enhance your PostgreSQL search speed.

The Problem: Slower Search Speeds in PostgreSQL

You may have implemented a structured FTS on PostgreSQL akin to what you had on SQLite and expected better performance given PostgreSQL's advanced capabilities. Here’s the scenario:

Basic Setup: You've established a simple table called submission with a functional trigger and an index for FTS.

Unexpected Results: With approximately 1500 rows of data, your searches in PostgreSQL are taking about 32 ms, whereas SQLite returns results in just 4 ms.

Questioning Performance: Given your setup should ideally be efficient, you wondered if you're missing something vital or if there's a potential alternative like Elasticsearch that could offer better performance.

Exploring the Causes of Slowing Speed

Upon deeper investigation, it became evident that the problem may not lie directly with PostgreSQL but with the way connections are managed within your application.

Key Insights from Execution Analysis

Using the EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) command revealed that:

Nested Loop Execution: The query execution planning showed a nested loop strategy which can be efficient under normal circumstances but may contribute to performance lag based on how connections are handled.

Buffering: While buffers appeared adequate, looking deeper into the connection handling processes could unveil performance issues.

The Solution: Improve Connection Management

Upon further investigation, it was discovered that the application was opening a fresh SQL connection for every database request. This is where a crucial performance improvement could be made:

Implement Connection Pooling

What is Connection Pooling?:

Connection pooling maintains a pool of database connections that can be reused, rather than opening a new one every time a request is made. This significantly reduces the overhead produced when establishing new connections.

Performance Gains:

Once the application was modified to use a connection pool, full text searches in PostgreSQL began to show measurable improvements, clocking in at about 10% faster than previously.

Effective Connection Management:

Consider using libraries or frameworks that support connection pooling for optimal performance. This ensures that your application can handle multiple database requests efficiently without the latency of repeatedly opening and closing connections.

Conclusion: Fine-Tuning Your Database for Speed

If you're facing slower full text search speeds in PostgreSQL compared to SQLite, it’s crucial to assess your connection management strategy. Many times, performance issues aren't with the database system itself but rather in how connections and queries are handled in your application code.

By implementing connection pooling and monitoring your queries with tools like EXPLAIN, you can uncover inefficiencies and optimize your database for faster retrieval times.

Now that you have the necessary insights to improve your PostgreSQL performance, you'll be better equipped to manage your full text search needs effectively. Remember, the right configurations can make a world of difference in execution speed!