Dumb Cops Get Totally OWNED, EDUCATED and DISMISSED Like Never Before, TOTAL Destruction!

The right to record in public spaces is protected under the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and press. This has been upheld in various court decisions, including Glik v. Cunniffe (2011), where the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled that individuals have the right to record public officials in public spaces. The auditor's assertion that he was within his rights to record on a public sidewalk is thus supported by constitutional provisions and legal precedents.

The police officer's claim that the auditor was committing harassment must be examined through the lens of relevant harassment laws and the context of the auditor's actions. Generally, harassment involves repeated or sustained behavior intended to annoy or intimidate. In this case, the auditor’s recording and questioning of the police officers, while potentially perceived as confrontational, do not necessarily meet the legal definition of harassment. Courts have consistently held that recording in public spaces, even if it involves questioning law enforcement officers, is protected as long as it does not interfere with their duties.

The auditor's request for the officer to identify himself and the subsequent filing of a complaint is an essential aspect of police accountability. According to standard law enforcement procedures and policies, officers are typically required to identify themselves upon request. This transparency is crucial for maintaining public trust and ensuring accountability. The officer's refusal to identify himself can be seen as a violation of these principles and may contribute to public mistrust.

The directive given by the police officers for the auditor to leave the public sidewalk raises significant legal questions. The Supreme Court in Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1972) addressed the issue of vagrancy laws and their enforcement, highlighting the importance of clear and specific legal directives. Unless the auditor was obstructing the facility or engaging in unlawful activity, his presence on the public sidewalk should not have warranted an order to leave. The auditor's refusal to comply with what he deemed an unlawful directive is rooted in his understanding of his constitutional rights.

Filing a complaint against a law enforcement officer is a formal process that allows individuals to voice grievances and seek redress for perceived misconduct. The arrival of the sergeant and the filing of the complaint demonstrate the procedural mechanisms in place for addressing such disputes. The auditor's insistence on following through with this process underscores the importance of accountability and the public's role in overseeing law enforcement conduct.

The auditor cited several legal cases and Supreme Court rulings to support his actions. Notable cases like Glik v. Cunniffe and Smith v. City of Cumming (2000) affirm the right to record public officials. These cases provide a robust legal foundation for the auditor’s claims and highlight the judiciary's recognition of this right as integral to the First Amendment.

THIS VIDEO IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ..
This video was created to educate citizens about constitutionally protected activities, law, and civilian rights, and emphasize the importance of constitutional awareness.

FAIR USE NOTICE.. this video may contain copyright material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, reviews and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Disclaimer: NONE of our videos should be considered a "call to action." We are not attorneys. Our videos should not be construed as legal advice. You should seek legal counsel if you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct. The facts presented in our videos are not indicative of our personal opinions. Laws, case law, ordinances, policies, legal doctrine, and all other jurisprudence is subject to the interpretation of the court. The videos shown are designed to be educational, and informative based on the information available at the time the video was published. All claims made are alleged.

Original video:    / @inthisdayage  
First Amendment audit 1st Amendment audit cops get owned id refusal dui checkpoint refusal auditing britain Amagansett press
#idrefusal #CopGetsOwned #dismissed #firstamendmentaudit #4thAmendment #CopWatch #Trespassing #Dismissed #copdismissed #RookieCop #1aAudit #Cop #Police #CopsOwned #1stamendmentaudit #Trespassing #rookiecops #4thamendment #5thamendment #walkofshame #1aAudits #copwatch #CopsGetOwned #CopsGettingOwned #lawenforcement