Скачать или смотреть Soviet Cosmonaut: "We Haven't Been to Space" -- TABOO CONSPIRACY

Celebrated Cosmonaut and recipient of the Hero of the Soviet Union, Igor Petrovich Volk, claims that NO cosmonaut has been to "space". He says that his fellow cosmonauts follow a code of honor that prevents them from talking about what happens in "space", but that they don't know anything about actually BEING in "space", so they wouldn't know what to say anyway!

He goes on to say that if anyone claims that Soviet cosmonauts HAVE been to "space" - that's not the truth.

That necessarily means that any report, video, interview or book that references any Soviet "space" mission is patently FALSE.

So, if the Russians weren't going to "space", then WHO were we (the US) in a "space race" with? The answer is NO ONE. Even our (America's) "space" program is fraudulent and none of our ACTORnauts/AstroNOTs have gone beyond the solid barrier above us. There's simply nowhere to "go"!

The whole thing has been faked by EVERY country that claims to have put people in "orbit" or sent them to land on and explore the moon's surface. It also means that ZERO "satellites" are flying around overhead and NO "space probes" have gone anywhere. The ISS is a fake, too. The Hubble Telescope is a lie (Research "SOFIA" - NASA's "Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy". THAT's your "Hubble".) We've been fed one fairy tale after another since NASA's inception on July 29, 1958. Everything they have done (besides projects on the ground and NOAA reports to do with the weather) is suspect and must be reexamined.

I just hope that one of our astronauts or maybe a member of one of the Telemetry Teams comes forward someday and exposes the fraud.

Props to this guy. Way to go, Igor!


—————————
FAIR USE STATEMENT

This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material falls under the category of what is believed to be FAIR USE in accordance
to the United States Copyright Act of 1976, Code 17 Section: 1a, 1b and 2 which states:

Fair use for:

1 a) Educational and non-profit purposes. This material is for the purpose of education, commentary and criticism, and is being distributed without profit, hence believed to be fair use. All music and video rights belong to the respective owners.

1 b) Transformative or derivative work. This material is being made available within this transformative or derivative work for the purpose of education, commentary and/or criticism. Transformative work basically means giving it a different meaning than the original.

2) Nature of Copyrighted Work. The second fair-use factor considers whether the copyrighted work includes a creative element. According to the Copyright Act, courts must examine “the nature of the copyrighted work, while recognizing that some works are closer to the core of intended copyright protection which garner only limited protection.

The use must be productive and must employ the quoted matter, in a different manner, or for a different purpose from the original.

If on the other hand, the secondary use adds value to the original, if the quoted matter is used as raw material, transformed in the creation of new information, new aesthetics, new insights, and/or new understandings.. This is the very type of activity the fair use doctrine intends to protect for the enrichment of society.

----------------------------------------------------------