Скачать или смотреть Troubleshooting JUnit Test Failures on GitLab: Accessing CP Resources Made Easy

Resolve issues with JUnit tests that pass locally but fail on GitLab. Discover how to successfully access resources in your pipeline.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65076784/ asked by the user 'Leos Literak' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1639556/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65086781/ provided by the user 'Leos Literak' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1639556/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Junit test accessing CP resource fails on gitlab but works locally

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Troubleshooting JUnit Test Failures on GitLab: Accessing CP Resources Made Easy

Setting up a build pipeline can be challenging, especially when it seems like everything is configured correctly yet problems persist. One common issue is when JUnit tests pass locally but fail during integration on platforms like GitLab. In this guide, we will dive into a specific scenario where accessing a resource caused a test failure and how to fix it.

The Problem

In our example, a user was configuring a GitLab pipeline to run their tests using JUnit 4.12 and Gradle 4.8.1. While the tests worked without a hitch in the local environment, they started failing on GitLab. The test in question was trying to access an XML file required for unmarshalling but threw a java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException. Here’s a quick recap of what happened:

The expected path for the XML resource was /builds/product/module/build/resources/test/xml/Client.xml.

The error indicated that the file could not be found during the test execution on GitLab, even though it existed and was correctly referenced locally.

Key Error Messages

The following error was particularly telling:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Accompanying this error, various directory commands were attempted in the pipeline, leading to a dead end:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

It appeared that the current working directory within the GitLab runner was not aligned with where the Java program expected the resource to reside.

The Solution

After analyzing the problem, a solution was readily implemented. The key is effectively accessing resources in a way that is more robust across different environments. Instead of using the File class to load the resource, we can utilize the URL class, which is more resilient to path discrepancies across different systems.

Revised Code

Here's how to implement the changes:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

URL vs. File:

File is dependent on the file system structure, which can vary between local and CI environments.

URL provides a more consistent way to access resources regardless of the underlying file system.

Classpath Resources:

By retrieving resources via getResource, the lookup process considers the classpath, thus ensuring that your resource is accessible no matter where the code runs.

Conclusion

Accessing resources in a way that’s environment-agnostic is crucial for successful builds and tests. By switching from File to URL for resource loading in your JUnit tests, you can avoid path-related issues that may arise in CI/CD environments like GitLab.

Incorporate this technique into your build process, and you'll find that your integration tests become more reliable and easier to maintain—yielding a more robust CI/CD pipeline.

If you’re still facing issues or have further questions, feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments below!