Скачать или смотреть Understanding Single-table vs Multi-table Design in DynamoDB for Unrelated Entities

Explore the differences between single-table and multi-table designs in DynamoDB when dealing with unrelated entities. Learn about the cost, performance, and maintainability considerations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65228789/ asked by the user 'tamakisquare' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/338961/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65237728/ provided by the user 'Charles' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2933177/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Single-table design or multi-table for unrelated entities?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Single-table vs Multi-table Design in DynamoDB for Unrelated Entities

If you're new to DynamoDB and have a background in NoSQL databases like Firebase, you might be curious about the best ways to structure your database when dealing with unrelated entities. One of the significant debates in the NoSQL community is whether you should use a single-table design or a multi-table design. This topic becomes particularly compelling when you consider the implications for performance, cost, and maintainability.

In this guide, we will explore the pros and cons of using a single table for unrelated entities compared to using separate tables. By the end, you will have a clearer understanding of how to structure your DynamoDB tables effectively.

The Essence of Table Design in DynamoDB

Single-table Design

A single-table design involves storing multiple entities within one table. This approach can optimize data retrieval due to reduced latency and simplifies the data model, especially in cases with related entities.

Multi-table Design

Conversely, a multi-table design separates entities into different tables. This method is often favored when entities are unrelated and do not require JOIN operations that are typically essential in SQL databases.

Pros and Cons of Single-table vs Multi-table Design

To help you make an informed decision, let’s break down the advantages and disadvantages of each approach when working with unrelated entities.

Pros of Single-table Design

Cost Savings:

There might be some monetary benefits to storing unrelated entities in a single table if you are using provisioned capacity.

If the I/O for unrelated data is minimal compared to the main table, you could save costs on provisioning.

Simplicity:

Having a single table can simplify your database architecture, making it easier to manage and understand.

Free Tier Advantage:

DynamoDB’s “always free” tier allows you to utilize 25GB of storage as well as 25 Write Capacity Units (WCU) and 25 Read Capacity Units (RCU) without worrying about how many tables you use.

Cons of Single-table Design

Capacity Management:

At scale, single tables can become a bottleneck. It may be difficult to tune the capacity for varied workloads effectively.

If you require high throughput, managing a single, large table may be less efficient than managing multiple smaller tables.

Performance Challenges:

If you have different access patterns for your unrelated entities, a single table could result in inefficient queries leading to performance degradation.

Pros of Multi-table Design

Capacity Tuning:

Separate tables allow better tuning of read and write capacities for distinct workloads.

You can match the specific needs of different entities without affecting others.

Performance Enhancement:

By isolating unrelated entities in different tables, you can avoid the overhead that can come with a single, larger table.

Cons of Multi-table Design

Increased Complexity:

A multi-table design can complicate your architecture, particularly if you have many unrelated entities that require individual management.

Moderate Cost Increase:

While it offers better efficiency, you might incur higher costs due to the need for more read/write capacity across multiple tables.

Conclusion

When choosing between single-table and multi-table designs for unrelated entities in DynamoDB, consider your specific use case. If you anticipate high throughput and distinct access patterns for your entities, a multi-table design may be advantageous despite its complexity. On the other hand, if your entities exhibit similar usage patterns and cost is a primary concern, a single-table design could be ef