Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Difference Between Two Counters in Verilog

Explore the critical distinctions between two Verilog counter statements and their behavior in hardware description language coding for improved clarity and accuracy in your designs.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62417362/ asked by the user 'vvillp0wer5' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13688725/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62417788/ provided by the user 'toolic' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/197758/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: What is the difference between these 2 counters?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Difference Between Two Counters in Verilog

When coding in Verilog, especially within an always_ff @ (posedge clk) block, it is crucial to understand how different coding styles and constructs can affect the outcome of your designs. One question that often arises among both beginners and experienced developers is: What is the difference between these two statements that control counters? Let’s break this down to provide you with a clear understanding.

The Problem: Counter Statements in Verilog

Consider the following two lines of code that decrement a counter based on the state of a signal named Intf.DataFull:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

vs

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Both statements aim to modify the value of rWrPageCntr, but they do so in different ways. To unpack their behavior, let's explore a practical example using a simple Verilog module.

The Solution: Analyzing the Counter Behavior

Here's a look at how each counter operates, illustrated with a Verilog snippet:

Code Example

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Outputs Explanation

When you run the above module, you will see multiple outputs that show how each counter behaves when DataFull is toggled:

Behavior of the First Statement:

This counter decrements strictly when Intf.DataFull is LOW (0). It operates as expected, counting down.

Behavior of the Second Statement:

Here, DataFull undergoes a bitwise inversion before being used in subtraction. When DataFull = 0, ~DataFull extends to 3'b111 (which is 7), affecting the counter unpredictably. On the other hand, when DataFull = 1, it converts to 3'b110 (or 6), leading to similar counter deterioration.

Key Takeaways

Simpler Logic: The first approach offers clearer, more predictable behavior, decrementing the counter precisely once when DataFull is 0.

Complex Arithmetic: The second approach introduces complexity due to bitwise manipulation, potentially resulting in unexpected values depending on signal widths and logic levels.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between these two counter statements is essential for effective Verilog programming. Using straightforward logic can help avoid confusion and unintended behavior in your digital designs. Always ensure to analyze how the bitwise operations may impact your counter logic, especially when dealing with signal widths.

If you’re embarking on complex designs, remember to respect simplicity and clarity—the best way to maintain robust, maintainable code.