Скачать или смотреть Why Are Syrian Chemical Weapons Worse Than Conventional Attacks?

As the US and other nations gear up for war in Syria, the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime against civilians has received great, perhaps inordinate attention. A little over a year ago, US President Barack Obama called the use of chemical weapons a "red line", though was vague about what would happen if that line were crossed. But are they really so different from bullets and bombs? Find out more with John Iadarola!

Do you think there is a meaningful difference between chemical weapons and conventional weapons? Let me know in the comments!

And don't forget guys if you like this video please Like Favorite and Share it with your friends to show your support - It really helps us out! See you next time!

***************************************­************
SUBSCRIBE for more videos throughout the week! http://tinyurl.com/d5o5tg3
ON FACEBOOK: www.facebook.com/TYTUniversity
ON TWITTER: @jiadarola

Every week John Iadarola recaps some of the most interesting news stories covering politics world events entertainment tech and more!
   / johniadarola  

***************************************­***************************************
TAGS: "syria chemical weapons" "syrian chemical weapons" "chemical weapons red line" "syria red line" "obama red line" "obama syria" "obama chemical weapons" "obama war" "united states syria" "assad" "syrian conflict" "Why Are Syrian Chemical Weapons Worse Than Conventional Attacks?" "syrian war" "chemical weapons ban" "ban on chemical weapons" "chemical weapons" "sarin gas" "syria sarin" "sarin" "mustard gas" "chlorine gas" "political news" "media news" "politics" "news" "john iadarola" "the young turks" "tytu" "tytuniversity"